1968
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-196801000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytotoxic Typing Antisera for Marrow Grafting in Littermate Dogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
2

Year Published

1971
1971
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The method of preparation of antisera and techniques for serological typing by the lymphocytotoxicity technique have been described in earlier reports (12,13 With the antisera currently in use in the Cooperstowvn colony, somiie haplotypes (represented symbolically in Table I as E, *, _, and V) appear to carry more than two SD specificities; one haplotype (A) carries three defined specificities, and so far, the haplotype represented as " " is detected by only one antigen. The superabundance of apparent antigenis on some haplotypes (e.g., 0, which appears to transmit no less than five SD antigenis) may be due to cross-reactivity or to the lack of ability to distiiiguish between public specificities which are comimiiloIn to several alleles and private specificities which have a very restricted distribution (10).…”
Section: Miethodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of preparation of antisera and techniques for serological typing by the lymphocytotoxicity technique have been described in earlier reports (12,13 With the antisera currently in use in the Cooperstowvn colony, somiie haplotypes (represented symbolically in Table I as E, *, _, and V) appear to carry more than two SD specificities; one haplotype (A) carries three defined specificities, and so far, the haplotype represented as " " is detected by only one antigen. The superabundance of apparent antigenis on some haplotypes (e.g., 0, which appears to transmit no less than five SD antigenis) may be due to cross-reactivity or to the lack of ability to distiiiguish between public specificities which are comimiiloIn to several alleles and private specificities which have a very restricted distribution (10).…”
Section: Miethodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DL-A phenotypes and presumed genotypes of the donors and recipients used to produce these antisera are outfined in Table I. The technique of lymphocytotoxicity of Epstein et al (15) was employed, with removal of erythrocytes by sedimentation before nylon infiltration, in order to separate lymphocytes from polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Erythrocyte group antigens A, C, and D were detected with the typing sera and technique of Swisher (27).…”
Section: Source Of Experimental Animals Production Of Typing Sera Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In initial studies, serological histocompatibility typing with a small panel of lymphocytotoxic antisera was used to select canine donor-recipient pairs for grafting. Clearly, the degree of matching with these antisera appeared to be an important determinant of Received for publication 28 December 1970. marrow graft rejection, development of a lethal graftversus-host (GVH)1 disease or eventual survival of the recipient after infusion of allogeneic marrow (1)(2)(3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%