2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2011.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytotoxicity and effects on inflammatory response of modified types of cellulose in macrophage-like THP-1 cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
38
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first studies showed evidence that highly crystalline regenerated cellulose did not induce the immunological response in vivo in a canine model, as judged by the absence of foreign body reaction (Miyamoto et al 1989). These results were in accordance with in vitro studies showing that CNFs did not induce toxicity of mouse and human fibroblasts (Mathew et al 2012;Alexandrescu et al 2013;Hua et al 2014), mouse and human macrophages (Vartiainen et al 2011), human monocytic leukaemia cells (Kollar et al 2011) and human cervix carcinoma cells (Pitkänen et al 2014). Recently, in contrast, it seems that cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) thinner and much shorter than CNFs, might be even toxic and proinflammatory, after pulmonary exposition in vivo, as judged by the accumulation of inflammatory cells within the bronchoalveolar fluid and increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines (Yanamala et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first studies showed evidence that highly crystalline regenerated cellulose did not induce the immunological response in vivo in a canine model, as judged by the absence of foreign body reaction (Miyamoto et al 1989). These results were in accordance with in vitro studies showing that CNFs did not induce toxicity of mouse and human fibroblasts (Mathew et al 2012;Alexandrescu et al 2013;Hua et al 2014), mouse and human macrophages (Vartiainen et al 2011), human monocytic leukaemia cells (Kollar et al 2011) and human cervix carcinoma cells (Pitkänen et al 2014). Recently, in contrast, it seems that cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) thinner and much shorter than CNFs, might be even toxic and proinflammatory, after pulmonary exposition in vivo, as judged by the accumulation of inflammatory cells within the bronchoalveolar fluid and increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines (Yanamala et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These findings are in accordance with those published by Vartiainen et al (2011) who demonstrated that microfibrillated cellulose did not caused any effects on TNF-α and IL-1β expression in a mouse monocytic cell line (RAW 264.7 cells) and human monocyte derived macrophages. In addition, it has been shown that microfibrillated nanocellulose was unable to trigger the production of TNF-α by human macrophage-like THP-1 cells, nor to modify the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced production of TNF-α (Kollar et al 2011), in contrast to microcrystalline nanocellulose, which significantly blocked the LPS-stimulated TNF-α secretion. Although our study should be extended to examine the effect of CNFs on the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines by isolated macrophages and dendritic cells, the findings that the secretion of both TNF-α and IL-1β in PBMNC cultures was unchanged by CNFs indicate that this wood-derived nanocellulose did not trigger the inflammatory response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous report, in chitosan-based matrix did not show any sign of toxicity on osteoblastic lines [39]. On the other hand, no cytotoxic effect has been reported for carboxymethyl cellulose [51]. Thus, our present results demonstrate that both PEC-US and PEC exerted no in vitro cytotoxicity on Raw 264.7 macrophages.…”
Section: Cytotoxicity Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…CNF produced with chemical pre-treatments are nanoobjects with widths less than 20 nm and lengths in the micrometer scale (Chinga-Carrasco, 2011), with advantages such as maintaining a moist environment, being strong and forming translucent structures. CNF has thus attracted much attention as a biomaterial for biomedical applications (Klemm et al, 2011;Kollar et al, 2011;Lin & Dufresne, 2014). However, in order to use CNF in contact with the human body, ultrapure CNF qualities are required, with low levels of endotoxins such as bacterially derived lipopolysaccharides (LPS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%