1990
DOI: 10.2307/1502623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Czechoslovak Higher Education at the Cross-Roads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to these studies, our results suggest that, at least in the context of post-communist Czech HE, the fraternity cluster approaching the internal control quadrant of the hierarchy culture (Cameron & Quinn, 2011;Patterson et al, 2005) appears to be most problematic, with the most negative perceptions of occupational well-being and work environment amongst academic workers. Such hierarchical cultures might have developed as a response to state-controlled HE during communism and have been continuously perpetuated in some departments (Koucký, 1990;Pesik & Gounko, 2011). Statecontrolled HE institutions represented centralised and controlled bureaucracies in which academic and leadership positions were determined by loyalty to the political agenda rather than competence and qualification, resulting in 'destructive manipulation of (…) internal functioning' (Koucký, 1990, p. 362).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to these studies, our results suggest that, at least in the context of post-communist Czech HE, the fraternity cluster approaching the internal control quadrant of the hierarchy culture (Cameron & Quinn, 2011;Patterson et al, 2005) appears to be most problematic, with the most negative perceptions of occupational well-being and work environment amongst academic workers. Such hierarchical cultures might have developed as a response to state-controlled HE during communism and have been continuously perpetuated in some departments (Koucký, 1990;Pesik & Gounko, 2011). Statecontrolled HE institutions represented centralised and controlled bureaucracies in which academic and leadership positions were determined by loyalty to the political agenda rather than competence and qualification, resulting in 'destructive manipulation of (…) internal functioning' (Koucký, 1990, p. 362).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bár a kelet-közép-európai országok intraregionális kapcsolatai erősödtek (3. táblázat), a legerősebb kapcsolatok több mint két évtizeddel a rendszerváltás után az egykori kommunista szövetségi államok tagállamai között léteznek. Magasan a legerősebb a Szlovákia és Csehország közötti kapcsolat: a kommunista Csehszlovákiában Csehország és Szlovákia közös felsőoktatási és tudományos rendszeren osztozott, a kutatók a központi kormányzat irányítása és felügyelete alatt tevékenykedtek (Koucký 1990). A függetlenné vált Csehország és Szlovákia tudományos rendszere annyira összefonódott, hogy a politikai törekvések sem tudták kettéválasztani őket.…”
Section: A Kelet-közép-európai Országok Együttműködési Mintázataiunclassified
“…Between 1918 and 1993, the Czech Republic and Slovakia constituted Czechoslovakia, a country that was part of the Eastern European communist bloc. As parts of Czechoslovakia, the Czech Republic and Slovakia shared a common higher education system, and research activities were conducted under the direct control of the government (Koucký, 1990). In 1993, after the breakdown of the communist regime, Czechoslovakia split into the two sovereign states of the Czech Republic and Slovakia.…”
Section: The Most Important International Collaboratorsmentioning
confidence: 99%