Purpose
This pilot study investigates the role of DAB2IP and EZH2 as prognostic biomarkers in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving definitive radiation therapy.
Methods and Materials
Immunohistochemistry was performed and scored by an expert genitourinary pathologist. Clinical endpoints evaluated were freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF), castration resistance-free survival (CRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Log-rank test and Cox regression were used to determine significance of biomarker levels with clinical outcome.
Results
Fifty-four patients with high-risk prostate cancer (stage ≥T3a, or Gleason score ≥8, or PSA ≥20) treated with radiation therapy from 2005-2012 at our institution were evaluated. Nearly all patients expressed EZH2 (98%), whereas 28% of patients revealed DAB2IP-reduction and 72% retained DAB2IP. Median follow up was 34.0 months for DAB2IP-reduced patients, 29.9 months for DAB2IP-retained patients, and 32.6 months in the EZH2 study. DAB2IP reduction portended worse outcome compared to DAB2IP-retained patients, including FFBF (4-year: 37% vs. 89%, p = 0.04), CRFS (4-year: 50% vs. 90%, p = 0.02), and DMFS (4-year: 36% vs. 97%, p = 0.05). Stratified EZH2 expression trended toward significance for worse FFBF and CRFS (p = 0.07). Patients with reduced DAB2IP or highest intensity EZH2 expression exhibited worse FFBF (4-year: 32% vs. 95%, p = 0.02), CRFS (4-year: 28% vs. 100%, p < 0.01), and DMFS (4-year: 39% vs. 100%, p = 0.04) compared to the control group.
Conclusion
DAB2IP loss is a potent biomarker that portends worse outcome despite definitive radiotherapy for patients with high-risk prostate cancer. EZH2 is expressed in most high-risk tumors and is a less potent discriminator of outcome in this study. DAB2IP status in combination with degree of EZH2 expression may be useful for determining patients with worse outcome within the high-risk prostate cancer population.