2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2010.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daily patterns of settlement and individual growth rates of young-of-the-year of the rockfish Sebastes inermis in a Sargassum bed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a variety of other juvenile rockfishes in California, growth rates range from 0.19 mm day −1 for yellowtail rockfish ( Sebastes flavidus ) to 0.97 mm day −1 for bocaccio ( Sebastes paucispinis ) (Woodbury and Ralston, 1991). In a nearshore nursery area, growth of the Japanese black rockfish ( Sebastes inermis ) ranged from 0.54 to 0.73 mm day −1 (Plaza et al. , 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a variety of other juvenile rockfishes in California, growth rates range from 0.19 mm day −1 for yellowtail rockfish ( Sebastes flavidus ) to 0.97 mm day −1 for bocaccio ( Sebastes paucispinis ) (Woodbury and Ralston, 1991). In a nearshore nursery area, growth of the Japanese black rockfish ( Sebastes inermis ) ranged from 0.54 to 0.73 mm day −1 (Plaza et al. , 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a variety of other juvenile rockfishes in California, growth rates range from 0.19 mm day )1 for yellowtail rockfish (Sebastes flavidus) to 0.97 mm day )1 for bocaccio (Sebastes paucispinis) (Woodbury and Ralston, 1991). In a nearshore nursery area, growth of the Japanese black rockfish (Sebastes inermis) ranged from 0.54 to 0.73 mm day )1 (Plaza et al, 2010). A more comprehensive review of reported juvenile rockfish (20 species) growth rates found an average growth rate of 0.29 mm day )1 from 15 field studies and 0.27 mm day )1 from six laboratory studies (Love et al, 1991).…”
Section: Yrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, studies in non-enclosed bays, such as Sendai Bay, have been limited. In addition, because Sendai Bay provides important fishing grounds (Omori, 1979) and favorable nursery grounds for fish (Yamashita et al, 1996;Oshima et al, 2010;Plaza et al, 2010;Narimatsu et al, 2013), it was supposed that the disturbance induced by the 2011 tsunami seriously affected the fish assemblages in Sendai Bay. We conducted demersal fish surveys on the sandy shore of Sendai Bay during 2004-2010 before the tsunami.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%