Daily sit-to-stands performed by adults: a systematic review

Bohannon, Richard W.

doi:10.1589/jpts.27.939

Cited by 55 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Sit-to-stand (STS) is a repeated movement of daily life with an average of 45 movements performed per day by adults [ 1 ]. This movement, requiring important muscular capacities [ 2 ], coordination and balance control is the prerequisite for all activities such as standing or walking [ 3 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sit-To-Stand Movement Evaluated Using an Inertial Measurement Unit Embedded in Smart Glasses—A Validation Study

Hellec

Chorin

Castagnetti³

et al. 2020

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wearable sensors have recently been used to evaluate biomechanical parameters of everyday movements, but few have been located at the head level. This study investigated the relative and absolute reliability (intra- and inter-session) and concurrent validity of an inertial measurement unit (IMU) embedded in smart eyeglasses during sit-to-stand (STS) movements for the measurement of maximal acceleration of the head. Reliability and concurrent validity were investigated in nineteen young and healthy participants by comparing the acceleration values of the glasses’ IMU to an optoelectronic system. Sit-to-stand movements were performed in laboratory conditions using standardized tests. Participants wore the smart glasses and completed two testing sessions with STS movements performed at two speeds (slow and comfortable) under two different conditions (with and without a cervical collar). Both the vertical and anteroposterior acceleration values were collected and analyzed. The use of the cervical collar did not significantly influence the results obtained. The relative reliability intra- and inter-session was good to excellent (i.e., intraclass correlation coefficients were between 0.78 and 0.91) and excellent absolute reliability (i.e., standard error of the measurement lower than 10% of the average test or retest value) was observed for the glasses, especially for the vertical axis. Whatever the testing sessions in all conditions, significant correlations (p < 0.001) were found for the acceleration values recorded either in the vertical axis and in the anteroposterior axis between the glasses and the optoelectronic system. Concurrent validity between the glasses and the optoelectronic system was observed. Our observations indicate that the IMU embedded in smart glasses is accurate to measure vertical acceleration during STS movements. Further studies should investigate the use of these smart glasses to assess the STS movement in unstandardized settings (i.e., clinical and/or home) and to report vertical acceleration values in an elderly population of fallers and non-fallers.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sit-To-Stand Movement Evaluated Using an Inertial Measurement Unit Embedded in Smart Glasses—A Validation Study

Hellec

Chorin

Castagnetti³

et al. 2020

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The sit-to-stand movement is important as it occurs many times each day and allows an individual to move independently. Older community-dwelling individuals are reported to perform at least 45 sit-to-stand transitions per day [16].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Functional movement compensations persist in individuals with hip osteoarthritis performing the five times sit-to-stand test 1 year after total hip arthroplasty

Esbjörnsson¹,

Naili²

2020

J Orthop Surg Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Methods to quantify and evaluate function are important for development of specific rehabilitation interventions. This study aimed to evaluate functional movement compensation in individuals with hip osteoarthritis performing the five times sit-to-stand test and change following total hip arthroplasty. To this end, trajectories of the body's center of mass in the medial-lateral and anterior-posterior dimensions were quantified prior to and 1 year after total hip arthroplasty and compared to a healthy control group. Methods: Twenty-eight individuals with hip osteoarthritis and 21 matched healthy controls were enrolled in this prospective study. Within 1 month prior to and 1 year after total hip arthroplasty, performance on the five times sit-to-stand test was evaluated using three-dimensional motion analysis and perceived pain using a visual analog scale. The center of mass trajectories for the medial-lateral and the anterior-posterior dimensions were identified, and the area under the curve was calculated, respectively. Repeated measures ANOVA were used to evaluate differences in the area under the curve, between pre-and postoperative performance, and between participants with hip osteoarthritis and controls. Results: Preoperatively, individuals with hip osteoarthritis displayed a larger contralateral shift (p < 0.001) and forward displacement of the center of mass (p = 0.022) compared to controls. After surgery, deviations in both dimensions were reduced (medial-lateral p = 0.013; anterior-posterior p = 0.009). However, as compared to controls, the contralateral shift of the center of mass remained larger (p = 0.010), indicative of persistent asymmetric limb loading. Perceived pain was significantly reduced postoperatively (p < 0.001). Conclusions: By quantifying the center of mass trajectory during five times sit-to-stand test performance, functional movement compensations could be detected and evaluated over time. Prior to total hip arthroplasty, individuals with hip osteoarthritis presented with an increased contralateral shift and forward displacement of the center of mass, representing a strategy to reduce pain by unloading the affected hip and reducing required hip and knee extension moments. After surgery, individuals with total hip arthroplasty displayed a persistent increased contralateral shift as compared to controls. This finding has implications for rehabilitation, where more focus must be directed towards normalizing loading of the limbs.

show abstract

“…Rising from a chair is a frequently performed activity of daily living 1 ) . Asymmetrical foot placement affects the center of gravity (COG) trajectory during the sit-to-stand motion, with trunk displacement toward the foot placed behind 2 ) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The relationship between energy cost and the center of gravity trajectory during sit-to-stand motion

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between jerk cost and the formation of the center of gravity trajectory during sit-to-stand motion with asymmetrical foot placement. [Subjects] Nineteen male volunteers were included (age: 21 ± 1 years). [Methods] The subjects moved from a sitting position to a standing position under two different foot placement conditions: (1) 0 degrees of dorsiflexion on the non-dominant side and 20 degrees of dorsiflexion on the dominant side (P1) and (2) 20 degrees of plantarflexion on the non-dominant side and 20 degrees of dorsiflexion on the dominant side (P2). Two standing conditions were used: (1) natural movement and (2) instructed movement, with instructions to increase weight bearing on the non-dominant side. The center of gravity trajectory and its jerk cost were calculated at each axis: front and back (jerk-x), right and left (jerk-y), and vertical (jerk-z). [Results] Jerk-x and jerk-y were significantly larger during instructed movement than natural movement in both P1 and P2. Jerk-z was not significantly different between instructed and natural movement in P1 or P2. [Conclusion] These results indicate that energy cost influences the formation of the center of gravity trajectory during sit-to-stand motion with asymmetrical foot placement.

show abstract

Daily sit-to-stands performed by adults: a systematic review

Cited by 55 publications

References 24 publications

Sit-To-Stand Movement Evaluated Using an Inertial Measurement Unit Embedded in Smart Glasses—A Validation Study

Sit-To-Stand Movement Evaluated Using an Inertial Measurement Unit Embedded in Smart Glasses—A Validation Study

Functional movement compensations persist in individuals with hip osteoarthritis performing the five times sit-to-stand test 1 year after total hip arthroplasty

The relationship between energy cost and the center of gravity trajectory during sit-to-stand motion

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About