Dall-Miles plating for periprosthetic B1 fractures of the femur

Tadross, T.S.F.; Nanu, A.; Buchanan, M.J.; Checketts, R. G.

doi:10.1016/s0883-5403(00)91129-x

Cited by 98 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The results of management of periprosthetic fractures have varied greatly due to factors such as bone quality, fracture pattern and method of treatment including nonoperative measures, reduction-fixation, or revision surgery. These treatments have historically been fraught with a high incidence of complications, treatment failures, and compromised outcomes [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Despite these problems, surgical treatment has become the standard in treating the majority of periprosthetic femur fracture [14].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Periprosthetic Fractures of the Femur after Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 99 Patients

Holley

Zelken

Padgett

et al. 2007

HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Speci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The medical records and radiographs of 99 patients treated for a periprosthetic femur fracture after total hip arthroplasty over a 17-year period at a single institution were prospectively reviewed. Fractures were classified according to the Vancouver system and stratified as to treatment method. Sixty-six patients had complete records available and a minimum of 12 months follow-up. Overall, 86% of the patients achieved fracture union. The success rate of cemented revision in the B2 and B3 groups was 84%, whereas cement-less revision was 86% successful. The complication rate of surgical treatment was 29%. Fracture union with a stable implant was possible in the majority of cases. Our results support the use of the Vancouver classification as a treatment algorithm.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Periprosthetic Fractures of the Femur after Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 99 Patients

Holley

Zelken

Padgett

et al. 2007

HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Speci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Due to the problem of lack of space for screws around the stem, the plate is combined with cables to treat periprosthetic fracture, a system that is referred to as a Dall-Miles plate. However, there is concern about the actual clinical outcomes when Dall-Miles plates are used [16][17][18][19].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Nickel-titanium shape-memory sawtooth-arm embracing fixator for periprosthetic femoral fractures

Zhao

Zhu

Sun

et al. 2011

International Orthopaedics (SICOT)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose We reviewed data to determine outcomes for 21 consecutive Vancouver type B1 or type C periprosthetic fractures that we treated between 2001 and 2008 using a nickel-titanium shape-memory sawtooth-arm embracing fixator. Methods The study participants were 12 men and 9 women (mean age, 70.8 years; range, 42-85 years). The average duration of follow-up monitoring was 39.7 months (range, 1-78 months). In five cases, cables and screws were used for further stabilisation. No bone grafting was performed for any of the patients. Results Results were satisfactory, except for one patient who died one month after surgery from a cause unrelated to arthroplasty. Bone union was achieved in the remaining 20 cases within an average of 5.25 months. No implant failures or malunions occurred in any of the patients. The average Harris hip score at the final follow-up examination was 79.3 points. Conclusions Our results show that the embracing fixator is a valid alternative treatment for Vancouver type B1 or type C periprosthetic femoral fractures.

show abstract

“…1). 골절의 분류에는 Johansson, Mallory, Schwartz, Stuchin, Kavanagh 등 여러 저자들의 방법이 있 으나 Vancouver 분류가 가장 널리 사용된다 12,26,27,34,35,42,45,46) . 이는 골절의 위치에 따라 근위 골간단부 골절은 A형, 대퇴 골 간부 골절은 B형, 그리고 대퇴 스템 원위부를 넘어선 골간부의 골절은 C형으로 나누고 각각의 유형에서 골절의 형태에 따라 단순 피질골 천공을 1형, 비전위성 선형 골절 을 2형, 그리고 전위된 불안정 골절을 3형으로 소분류 하 였다 (Table 1).…”

unclassified

Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures after Hip Arthroplasty

Hwang¹,

Kim²

2011

J Korean Fract Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dall-Miles plating for periprosthetic B1 fractures of the femur

Cited by 98 publications

References 26 publications

Periprosthetic Fractures of the Femur after Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 99 Patients

Periprosthetic Fractures of the Femur after Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 99 Patients

Nickel-titanium shape-memory sawtooth-arm embracing fixator for periprosthetic femoral fractures

Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures after Hip Arthroplasty

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About