Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Performance-Based and Life-Cycle Structural Engineering (PLSE 2015) 2015
DOI: 10.14264/uql.2016.922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage detection with interval analysis for uncertainties quantification

Abstract: Infrastructure damage detection is widely adopted to prevent structural collapse and cut down the maintenance for owners with timely repair, but most damage detection methods only obtain marginal performance for in-situ structures due to uncertainties. A non-probabilistic damage detection method for uncertainty quantification is presented in this study. The diagnosis elements are extracted from the coefficient matrix of the vector auto-regressive (VAR) model which is identified from the measured acceleration, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The material properties of the bridge components, such as the modulus of elasticity and Poisson's ratio of the bridge materials, may vary due to manufacturing variability or aging. This can introduce uncertainties in the strain-based [27] damage detection results.…”
Section: Materials Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material properties of the bridge components, such as the modulus of elasticity and Poisson's ratio of the bridge materials, may vary due to manufacturing variability or aging. This can introduce uncertainties in the strain-based [27] damage detection results.…”
Section: Materials Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principle of the method is that the distance between the models of damaged and undamaged states is correlated with the damage location information. Liu et al [15] proposed a non-probabilistic damage detection method, which employed the coefficient matrix of vector auto-regressive model to extract diagnosis elements and used Mahalanobis distance of these diagnosis elements to detect damages. Mei et al [12] presented a substructure-based damage identification method to find damage locations and severity, and autoregressive moving average with exogenous variables model residual was utilized to correct the damage indicator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mustapha et al 13 utilized the AR-ARX model and the variation between the residual errors obtained from the intact and damaged states to detect cracking in steel reinforced concrete structures. Liu et al 14 considered the model coefficient sensitivity to the damage, and utilized the coefficient of time-domain model and Mahalanobis distance to identify structural damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%