1983
DOI: 10.1143/jpsj.52.617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damping Factor of the Riedel Peak in Bridge-Type Josephoson Junctions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In junctions with finite electron transparency D (assumed to be vanishingly small in tunnel junctions), finite D itself directly smears the Riedel singularity [37]. Smearing of any kind turns Riedel singularity into a finite "Riedel peak" of the supercurrent, which was actively studied since the early days of investigations of the Josephson effect -see, e.g., [38][39][40][41][42][43]. These investigations showed that the typical magnitude of the energy gap smearing in tunnel junctions is quite small, on the order of 0.01 of the energy gap itself.…”
Section: Gap Resonance In the Dynamics Of The Current-biased Junctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In junctions with finite electron transparency D (assumed to be vanishingly small in tunnel junctions), finite D itself directly smears the Riedel singularity [37]. Smearing of any kind turns Riedel singularity into a finite "Riedel peak" of the supercurrent, which was actively studied since the early days of investigations of the Josephson effect -see, e.g., [38][39][40][41][42][43]. These investigations showed that the typical magnitude of the energy gap smearing in tunnel junctions is quite small, on the order of 0.01 of the energy gap itself.…”
Section: Gap Resonance In the Dynamics Of The Current-biased Junctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 15) characterizes the gap smearing, and effectively cuts off the current kernels at time t 0 1/(Ωw). As follows from the experimental results [38][39][40][41][42][43], one can use an estimate w 0.01, although the gap smearing strength varies for different junction materials and structures. Such a Gaussian suppression factor for the gap oscillations in time-domain implies that the magnitude of the total energy gap of the junction exhibits small Gaussian fluctuations around the mean value ∆ 1 + ∆ 2 of relative magnitude w. I now discuss the results for the dc current-voltage characteristics ("IV curves") of a current-biased Josephson tunnel junction obtained by the direct numerical solution of the integro-differential equations (10) with the current kernels (11) regularized according to Eq.…”
Section: Gap Resonance In the Dynamics Of The Current-biased Junctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a function of applied voltage, V, the amplitudes, I c1 and I c2 , show singularities originating from the gap, Á, in an s-wave superconductor. The I c1 has a logarithmic divergence called the Riedel peak at the gap voltage, V ¼ 2Á=e, due to the square root singularities in the density of states, [2][3][4][5][6][7] while the I c2 shows a discontinuity at V ¼ 2Á=e and is zero below V < 2Á=e at zero temperature. 3,5) The I c2 is experimentally observed near the superconducting transition temperature, T c , 8) in various types of Josephson junctions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The I c2 is experimentally observed near the superconducting transition temperature, T c [6]. The ac Josephson effect has been studied in various types of Josephson junctions [7,8]. For instance, in a Josephson junction where two superconductors are separated by a small normal metal (NM), it is found that the above mentioned singularities with V are suppressed when the interfaces are highly transparent [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%