2008
DOI: 10.2307/41166466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dancing with Gorillas: How Small Companies Can Partner Effectively with MNCs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
113
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
113
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…More in-depth qualitative studies of the process by which private firms interact with foreign entrants and respond to their competitive threats are clearly needed in order to explore the behaviour foundation and implications of such a relationship. Additionally, a few scholars have examined how SMEs in emerging markets, such as India, learnt from large multinational firms, and the process was vividly described as 'learning to dance with gorillas' or 'swimming with sharks' (Prashantham & Birkinshaw, 2008;Prashantham & Dhanaraj, 2015). However, foreign competition may also emanate from smaller foreign companies.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More in-depth qualitative studies of the process by which private firms interact with foreign entrants and respond to their competitive threats are clearly needed in order to explore the behaviour foundation and implications of such a relationship. Additionally, a few scholars have examined how SMEs in emerging markets, such as India, learnt from large multinational firms, and the process was vividly described as 'learning to dance with gorillas' or 'swimming with sharks' (Prashantham & Birkinshaw, 2008;Prashantham & Dhanaraj, 2015). However, foreign competition may also emanate from smaller foreign companies.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that the influence of organisational proximity on MNE co-location in science parks is affected by the degree of competition with potential partners, and that MNEs view smaller firms and knowledge institutes as a better choice for positive knowledge flows (Cantwell and Santangelo 2002;Mariotti, Piscitello, and Elia 2010). MNEs co-locate in all three science parks to pursue relationships with small domestic firms (startups and/or spin-offs), as they are perceived to have a disruptive, energetic and quicker way of thinking/working than MNEs are able to achieve (Prashantham and Birkinshaw 2008). MNEs seek access to these competences to be able to respond more effectively to new developments.…”
Section: Patterns Of Proximity In Dutch Science Parksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MNEs seek access to these competences to be able to respond more effectively to new developments. Reciprocally, partnerships with MNEs (or local MNE subsidiaries) are an effective way for small firms to globalise successfully (Prashantham and Birkinshaw 2008). Significantly, low (structural) organisational proximity seems to drive collaborations rather than prevent successful knowledge-based collaboration, thereby promoting co-location, see Figure 1.…”
Section: Patterns Of Proximity In Dutch Science Parksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for the investing firm, given that -as different papers remark -the ownership structure affects firms' performance (Chang et al 2013;Rasheed 2005;Brouthers et al 2003;Siripaisalpipat, Hoshino 2000), business opportunities for local firms (Prashantham, Birkinshaw 2008;Akande et al 2010;Miozzo et al 2012), the rest of the financial structure (Schindler, Schjelderup 2012), the knowledge of the local foreign market (Park et al 2012), and even the probability of failure of the project (Hennart, Zeng 2002). Therefore, it is not surprising that normative consequences may emerge from this research topic in order to know ex-ante the optimal mode of entry.…”
Section: S471mentioning
confidence: 99%