1992
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9437(1992)118:1(104)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Darcy‐Weisbach Roughness Coefficients for Gravel and Cobble Surfaces

Abstract: A laboratory study is conducted to measure Darcy-Weisbach roughness coefficients for selected gravel and cobble materials. Varying rates of flow are introduced into a flume in which a given size class of gravel or cobble material is securely attached. Roughness coefficients are calculated from measurements of discharge rate and flow velocity. The laboratory data are used to develop regression equations for relating roughness coefficients to surface cover and Reynolds number. Accurate prediction of roughness co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
1
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
34
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this model, k w is given a value of 10 m (m 3 s −1 ) −1/2 , which is reasonable for natural rivers (Leopold and Maddock, 1953), but the value can range between 1 and 10 due to differences in runoff variability, substrate properties, and sediment load (Whipple et al, 2013). The friction factor, F , is the Darcy-Weisbach friction factor, which can range from 0.01-1.0 for natural rivers (Gilley et al, 1992;Hin et al, 2008). With a lower friction factor (representing smooth channel walls), the lateral erosion ratio would be higher due to less energy being dissipated on the channel walls, leaving more energy available for lateral erosion.…”
Section: Lateral Erosion Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this model, k w is given a value of 10 m (m 3 s −1 ) −1/2 , which is reasonable for natural rivers (Leopold and Maddock, 1953), but the value can range between 1 and 10 due to differences in runoff variability, substrate properties, and sediment load (Whipple et al, 2013). The friction factor, F , is the Darcy-Weisbach friction factor, which can range from 0.01-1.0 for natural rivers (Gilley et al, 1992;Hin et al, 2008). With a lower friction factor (representing smooth channel walls), the lateral erosion ratio would be higher due to less energy being dissipated on the channel walls, leaving more energy available for lateral erosion.…”
Section: Lateral Erosion Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data from [21] for rigid vegetation (C d0 = 1) also confirms the validity of the model for circular cylinders. The model is also compared with the results from [23], which are expressed in terms of Reynolds number R e = Uh/ν (Figures 9 and 10). They are a good example of the model validity for emergent-submerged transition and large natural roughness elements.…”
Section: Validation Of Friction Coefficients For River Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chow (1959) and Savat (1980) studied the flume experiments on rill; the results indicate a progressive decrease in hydraulic roughness (n) with increased Reynolds number (Rn). In a case, if depth of water is less than the size of the physical roughness coefficient, then Mannings Roughness coefficient increases in correspondence with increase in Rn values (Govers, 1992;Abrahams et al, 1986;Abrahams & Parsons, 1994;Gilley et al, 1992;Prosser & Dietrich, 1995). The spatial variability of rilling process depends on flow character controlled by channel roughness and expressed as Reynolds number (Rn) and Froude number (Nearing et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%