2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.65.043007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dark energy and cosmic microwave background bispectrum

Abstract: We compute the cosmic microwave background bispectrum arising from the cross-correlation of primordial, lensing and Rees-Sciama signals. The amplitude of the bispectrum signal is sensitive to the matter density parameter, Omega_0, and the equation of state of the dark energy, which we parameterize by w_Q. We conclude that the dataset of the Atacama Cosmology Telescope, combined with MAP 2-year data or the Planck data set alone will allow us to break the degeneracy between Omega_0 and w_Q that arises from the a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
111
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
111
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The signal of most interest for parameter studies is the linear late ISW since it can be used as a constraint on dark energy models [32] -the CMB lensing potential happens to correlate at the 90% level with the ISW [33]. However the total temperature correlation drops off rapidly with scale as the ISW component of the signal tends to cancel between multiple perturbations along the line of sight.…”
Section: Temperature-lensing Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The signal of most interest for parameter studies is the linear late ISW since it can be used as a constraint on dark energy models [32] -the CMB lensing potential happens to correlate at the 90% level with the ISW [33]. However the total temperature correlation drops off rapidly with scale as the ISW component of the signal tends to cancel between multiple perturbations along the line of sight.…”
Section: Temperature-lensing Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermal SZ signal is frequency dependent, but depending on frequency potentially important at l ∼ 100 [34]; I shall not consider this signal further here since it is zero at the SZ null and in principle is isolable by its frequency dependence, as are other potentially significant foreground signals like the correlation with the cosmic infrared background (CIB) [35,36] (the CIB signal is also small at frequencies usually used for cosmological analysis). The late-time ISW effect can also be calculated accurately on intermediate and small scales using the Limber approximation result [32] …”
Section: Temperature-lensing Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They produce a negligible correlation between lensing amplitude estimates for the multipole ranges considered here. The T −φ correlation is potentially a powerful probe of dark energy dynamics (e.g., Verde & Spergel 2002) and modified theories of gravity (e.g., Acquaviva et al 2004). The power spectrum C T φ can be measured from the Planck data using the CMB 3-point function (Planck Collaboration XXIV 2014) or, equivalently, by cross-correlating the φ reconstruction with the large-angle temperature anisotropies (Planck Collaboration XIX 2014) although the detection significance is only around 3σ.…”
Section: Cmb Lensing Measured By Planckmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the single-lens parameters fixed to the best-fit values, we used the initial condition grid search method to search over the parameter ranges   s 0.48 2.10,   --q 4 log 2, and   p q p -, with t * fixed at * = t 0.05. We then select ∼10 of the best-fit values from the initial condition grid search (with very different values of q s , , and θ) to use as initial conditions for full, nonlinear modeling runs using the Bennett (2010) c 2 minimization recipe, which is a modification of the Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm (Verde et al 2003). The parameters of the best-fit binary-lens model and the c 2 improvement are compared with the best-fit single-lens model in Table 2.…”
Section: Best-fit Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%