2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dark Energy Survey identification of a low-mass active galactic nucleus at redshift 0.823 from optical variability

Abstract: ABSTRACT We report the identification of a low-mass active galactic nucleus (AGN), DES J0218−0430, in a redshift z = 0.823 galaxy in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Supernova field. We select DES J0218−0430 as an AGN candidate by characterizing its long-term optical variability alone based on DES optical broad-band light curves spanning over 6 yr. An archival optical spectrum from the fourth phase of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey shows both broad Mg ii and broad H β … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
(121 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, by imposing the cut on the variability time-scale, we introduce a selection effect which may reduce the correlation. While based on only 11 data points and the results of Guo et al ( 2020 ), our results may suggest no significant redshift evolution in the M BH -M * scaling relation from redshift z ∼ 1 to z ∼ 0 (see also Ding et al 2020 ;Li et al 2021 ), which is consistent with previous results based on the M BH -σ * relation (e.g. Shen et al 2015 ;Sexton et al 2019 ).…”
Section: Comparison To Host Scaling Relationssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Also, by imposing the cut on the variability time-scale, we introduce a selection effect which may reduce the correlation. While based on only 11 data points and the results of Guo et al ( 2020 ), our results may suggest no significant redshift evolution in the M BH -M * scaling relation from redshift z ∼ 1 to z ∼ 0 (see also Ding et al 2020 ;Li et al 2021 ), which is consistent with previous results based on the M BH -σ * relation (e.g. Shen et al 2015 ;Sexton et al 2019 ).…”
Section: Comparison To Host Scaling Relationssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is consistent with fig. 7 of Guo et al ( 2020 ), which showed that DES-SN variability selection can only be matched by deep X-ray/radio imaging in the mass-redshift parameter space. In contrast, our technique co v ers a much larger area of the sky, but will miss Type II AGN with variability obscured in the optical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Baldassare et al (2018) demonstrated the capability of SDSS imaging to identify dwarf AGNs using long-term variability. Guo et al (2020) demonstrated the capability of Dark Energy Survey photometry to identify dwarf AGNs at intermediate redshifts of z ∼ 0.8. A dwarf Type I AGN similar to the archetypal example NGC 4395 with SMBH mass of 10 5 M⊙ will vary photometrically at the ∼1 per cent level on a rest-frame timescale of a few days (Kelly et al 2009;Burke et al 2020b).…”
Section: Prospects For Future Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%