Formen Und Funktionen 2016
DOI: 10.1515/9783110478976-010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Das generische Maskulinum schleicht zurück

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The automated analysis workflow consists of five components, of which the following three are implemented in the current prototype: an IDF-based component, a combined dictionary-based component, and a component based on semantically created bias dictionary. One of the two components that are not yet implemented will use SVM to analyze historic linguistic cues , such as the pejorative sentiment of the suffix -ling in words like Flüchtling or Schönling [3]. The second component that is not yet implemented relies on network analysis.…”
Section: Methodology and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The automated analysis workflow consists of five components, of which the following three are implemented in the current prototype: an IDF-based component, a combined dictionary-based component, and a component based on semantically created bias dictionary. One of the two components that are not yet implemented will use SVM to analyze historic linguistic cues , such as the pejorative sentiment of the suffix -ling in words like Flüchtling or Schönling [3]. The second component that is not yet implemented relies on network analysis.…”
Section: Methodology and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sonderling, Schönling or Schwächling. Official discussions, however, lead into the direction that such derivatives should generally be replaced by participle derivative constructions like Geflüchtete [7]. Our literature review yielded that no central collection of such rules or any large scale analysis of their real effects exists.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Bülow and Herz (2014), for instance, found that the authors of the reformulated German Road Traffic Act (2013) transformed more than 30 generic masculine forms like Fußgänger ('pedestrians') or Radfahrer ('cyclists') into nominalized participles such as zu Fuß Gehende ('those who go by foot', 'pedestrians') and Rad Fahrende ('those who cycle by bike', 'cyclists') to meet the requirement of gender sensitivity. What is more, Harnisch (2016) found that in many study regulations, generic masculine forms like Studenten ('students') or Dozenten ('lecturers') had been transformed into Genus-neutral nominalized participles like Studierende ('students') and Dozierende ('lecturers') to make the texts gender sensitive. What is even more interesting is that Harnisch (2016), Bülow (n.d.) and (Bülow & Harnisch, 2015) have found that many authors use nominalized participles in the singular (der Studierende (MASK.SG) 'the student').…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparently, authors may not be aware that nominalized participles in the singular are actually Genus-specific rather than Genus-neutral. To give an example from a reformulated study regulation (Harnisch, 2016): Harnisch ( 2016) who began a body of work in the early 1990s and Bülow (forthcoming) who has continued this line of work since 2013 collected more than a hundred cases from different types of texts in which a traditional generic masculine was replaced with another more complex generic masculine nominalized participle in order to comply with the requirements of gender-mainstreaming ideology. This is a proto-example of a process of reanalysis which can be interpreted as exaptation in the evolutionary sense of the word's meaning (Bülow, forthcoming;Bülow & Harnisch, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%