Das Opfer vor dem Internationalen Strafgerichtshof

Bock, Stefanie

doi:10.3790/978-3-428-53258-2

Cited by 16 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…exception entails a correlative loss of sovereignty and legitimate forms of intrusive humanitarian intervention. Crimes against humanity (Morales, 2020) emerge as a global state of exception (Williams, 1999) and justify the suspension of guarantees guaranteed by state sovereignty, the deactivation of the territorial limits of the ius puniendi (Bock, 2007). This model with the principle of individual responsibility expressed through art.…”

Section: Exceptional Humanitarian Lawmentioning

confidence: 99%

Thoughts, analysis perspectives and critics of function of punishment in international criminal law

Liakopoulos¹

2023

YIECPL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

International criminal law constitutes, due to its intrinsic characteristics, a competition challenge at the universal level of norms and crimes which finds its most natural and logical manifestation through the final penalties provided for in the Statute of the International Criminal Court (StICC). The present work has as its object to analyze the punishment according to the StICC, the hypotheses of normative convergences that are established alongside the foreseen sentences, the jurisprudential cases, the verifiable convergences within the global international community where the sentences take place over the years, the path of harmonization, integration, evolution, development not so much of international criminal law but also of domestic law, the rationalization of accounts with internal justice which is never eliminated by the international one, snubbed towards a type of annihilating a priori inevitable phenomena against the impunity, the continuous violence against human rights and the strength of the victors and hegemons.

show abstract

Section: Exceptional Humanitarian Lawmentioning

confidence: 99%

Thoughts, analysis perspectives and critics of function of punishment in international criminal law

Liakopoulos¹

2023

YIECPL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

International Adjudication Under Particular Consideration of International Criminal Justice: The German Contribution

Bock

2020

European International Law Traditions

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The question of how proceedings can be initiated ('trigger mechanism') was very controversial. Some statesamong them the USA and Chinafeared that proprio motu powers might be misused by an overzealous prosecutor to initiate politically motivated, unfounded investigations. Their opponents, to the contrary, argued that proprio motu powers are essential for a strong and independent court, because without them, the ICC would not be able to prosecute international crimes whenfor political or other reasonsthe state parties and the

show abstract

Victims’ Participation Under the Rome Statute

Safferling

Petrossian

2021

Victims Before the International Criminal Court

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Das Opfer vor dem Internationalen Strafgerichtshof

Cited by 16 publications

References 0 publications

Thoughts, analysis perspectives and critics of function of punishment in international criminal law

Thoughts, analysis perspectives and critics of function of punishment in international criminal law

International Adjudication Under Particular Consideration of International Criminal Justice: The German Contribution

Victims’ Participation Under the Rome Statute

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About