Das Persönlichkeitsinventar für ICD-11: Reliabilität und Validität der deutschen Version in einer klinischen und nicht-klinischen Stichprobe- Erratum Table2

Damovsky, Florian; Zettl, Max; Zimmermann, Johannes; Herbold, Willy; Curtius, Theresa; Buecker, Susanne; Taubner, Svenja; Volkert, Jana

doi:10.31219/osf.io/cm3qv

Cited by 5 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The DOS mean score (18.13) was similar to the mean score observed in a general population sample in the DOS validation study (17.75) [53]. The PiCD trait domain mean scores were largely comparable to the scores obtained from a general population sample in the validation study of the German PiCD [47]. The LPF-BF 2.0 mean score (24.24) was slightly elevated compared to the mean score obtained from an online community sample in the validation study of the German LPFS-BF 2.0 (22.72) [42].…”

Section: Preliminary Analysessupporting

confidence: 73%

“…We used the PiCD (German version) [46,47] for assessing the ICD-11 personality trait domains. This self-report instrument assesses the five ICD-11 personality trait domains (negative affectivity, detachment, dissociality, disinhibition, anankastia) with 12 items each (e.g., "I am usually an anxious person" for negative affectivity, "I prefer to stay away from other people" for detachment, "I am always ready for conflict" for dissociality, "I tend to act impulsively" for disinhibition, and "I strive for perfection" for anankastia).…”

Section: Icd-11 Personality Trait Domainsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

An exploratory study of associations between the ICD-11 personality disorder model and eating pathology

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Recently, the International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11) has introduced a paradigm shift in personality disorder conceptualization. The novel ICD-11 personality disorder model comprises a dimensional assessment of personality dysfunction and five maladaptive personality trait domains. Maladaptive personality plays a central role in eating pathology. Yet, relations between the ICD-11 personality disorder model and eating pathology are, to date, unclear. Thus, this study aimed to explore the bivariate, incremental, and interactive associations of the ICD-11 personality disorder model components with eating pathology domains. Methods A predominantly female (85%) sample of 888 German-speaking community adults completed validated self-report measures of personality dysfunction, the ICD-11 personality trait domains, and five eating pathology domains (drive for thinness, bulimia, body dissatisfaction, orthorexia, binge eating). Bivariate and hierarchical regressions models were used to investigate bivariate, incremental, and interactive relations between the ICD-11 personality disorder model components and eating pathology. Results Personality dysfunction and the ICD-11 personality trait domains showed statistically significant bivariate relations with eating pathology. Additionally, personality dysfunction and most ICD-11 personality trait domains displayed incremental links with eating pathology. Finally, the relations of the ICD-11 personality trait domains with eating pathology were largely independent of the severity of personality dysfunction. Conclusions This study indicated that all ICD-11 personality disorder model components are uniquely linked to eating pathology. Beyond maladaptive personality trait domains, the strong and incremental relations of personality dysfunction with eating pathology have potential implications for theory building. Further research using longitudinal designs is needed to evaluate causal links between the ICD-11 personality disorder model components and eating pathology.

show abstract

Section: Preliminary Analysessupporting

confidence: 73%

Section: Icd-11 Personality Trait Domainsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An exploratory study of associations between the ICD-11 personality disorder model and eating pathology

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We assessed the ICD-11 personality trait domains with the German version of the PiCD (Damovsky et al, 2021; Oltmanns & Widiger, 2018). The PiCD assesses negative affectivity, detachment, dissociality, disinhibition, and anankastia with 12 items each.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Finally, a professional translator back-translated the revised German scale version. The authors of the original English PiCD compared this back-translation to the original scale and approved the translation (for details, see Damovsky et al, 2021).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Alignment of the personality inventory for ICD-11 with the five-factor model of personality.

Stricker¹,

Buecker²,

Pietrowsky³

2022

Psychological Assessment

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A central innovation in the International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11) is a dimensional personality disorder model differentiating five personality trait domains. The Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD) is a frequently used measure to assess these components of the ICD-11 personality disorder model. Conceptually, the ICD-11 personality trait domains correspond to trait domains from the five-factor model (FFM) of personality. However, empirically, it is unclear how the PiCD scales align with the FFM. In this questionnaire study with 480 German community adults, we assessed the joint factor structure of the PiCD trait domain scales and the FFM personality facets (assessed with the Big Five Inventory-2 [BFI-2]). A principal axis factor analysis revealed a joint five-factorial structure. The PiCD trait domain scales and the BFI-2 facet scales of the respectively corresponding FFM trait domains were almost perfectly aligned, including a bipolar anankastia-disinhibition factor along the conscientiousness dimension. Facets of openness to experience formed a fifth factor, separate from the PiCD scales. Together, these findings demonstrate structural correspondences of the PiCD trait domain scales and the respective BFI-2 facet scales, mirroring conceptual analogies between the ICD-11 and FFM personality models. Public Significance StatementThe study suggests that the Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD) aligns with the five-factor model (FFM) of personality. Thus, the PiCD appears to reflect theoretically postulated correspondences between the FFM and the ICD-11 personality disorder model, which supports the validity of the PiCD trait domain scores for assessing the ICD-11 personality trait domains.

show abstract

Validating the German version of the Personality Disorder Severity-ICD-11 Scale using nominal response models.

Zimmermann¹,

Falk²,

Wendt³

et al. 2023

Psychological Assessment

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) features a new classification of personality disorders (PD), focusing on the severity of PD. Although there are numerous self-report measures that assess PD severity, to date only the Personality Disorder Severity-ICD-11 (PDS-ICD-11) is based on ICD-11's operationalization of PD. Initial results indicated that the PDS-ICD-11 measures a unidimensional construct, but the assumptions made for scoring its bipolar items had not been fully examined. The aim of this study is to fill this gap and investigate the latent structure of the German version of the PDS-ICD-11 using nominal response models (NRM), which allow for testing these assumptions. We applied the PDS-ICD-11 together with other self-report measures in a sample of 1,228 individuals from the general population. NRM indicated an acceptable fit of a unidimensional model, with only few deviations from the theoretically imposed scoring scheme. The total score was sufficiently reliable and correlated meaningfully with other self-report measures of PD severity. Regarding Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) and ICD-11 maladaptive trait domains, the total score was found to be most strongly associated with negative affectivity, whereas associations with antagonism and anankastia were small or nonsignificant. We conclude that the proposed scoring scheme of the PDS-ICD-11 items is acceptable, and the examined psychometric properties of the German version largely correspond to the results from the English-language development study. The total score, however, depicts more internalizing than externalizing personality pathology. Future studies should investigate the diagnostic efficiency of the PDS-ICD-11 scale using multiple methods and time points as well as clinical and forensic samples. Public Significance StatementThis study suggests that the scoring scheme for the items of the Personality Disorder Severity-ICD-11 (PDS-ICD-11) scale is largely appropriate, but that the total score may primarily reflect internalizing rather than externalizing problems. Multimethod and longitudinal studies are needed for a conclusive evaluation of the PDS-ICD-11.

show abstract

Das Persönlichkeitsinventar für ICD-11: Reliabilität und Validität der deutschen Version in einer klinischen und nicht-klinischen Stichprobe- Erratum Table2

Cited by 5 publications

References 7 publications

An exploratory study of associations between the ICD-11 personality disorder model and eating pathology

An exploratory study of associations between the ICD-11 personality disorder model and eating pathology

Alignment of the personality inventory for ICD-11 with the five-factor model of personality.

Validating the German version of the Personality Disorder Severity-ICD-11 Scale using nominal response models.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About