Das universelle Neugeborenenh�rscreening als Anwendung automatisierter audiologischer Methoden

Delb, W.

doi:10.1007/s00106-003-0989-5

Cited by 14 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The dichotomous nature in combination with the sensibility limit of 30 dB hearing loss qualifies TEOAE as ideal procedure for the early detection of congenital hearing disorders in the context of newborn hearing screening [ 183 ], [ 184 ], [ 185 ], [ 186 ], [ 187 ], [ 188 ], [ 189 ], [ 190 ], [ 191 ], [ 192 ], [ 193 ], [ 194 ], [ 195 ], [ 196 ], [ 197 ]. The measurement and evaluation procedures that were automated for this purpose use a more sophisticated signal detection procedure based on statistical analysis [ 198 ], [ 199 ].…”

Section: Objective Audiometrymentioning

confidence: 99%

Current audiological diagnostics

Hoth

Baljić

2017

GMS Current Topics in Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery; 16:Doc09

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Objective Audiometrymentioning

confidence: 99%

Current audiological diagnostics

Hoth

Baljić

2017

GMS Current Topics in Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery; 16:Doc09

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The analysis of auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) is considered to be a robust method for the objective determination of hearing thresholds (HTs). 1 , 2 Such a method is of great relevance in the case of non-cooperative patients, i.e., newborns, in whom the application of behavioral methods is not possible, but where an early detection of a hearing loss and HTs and an opportune intervention and therapy are of great relevance, especially for the further development of the patients. 3 , 4…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…5 TEOAEs can be used for a hearing check but they do not allow for a quantification of the hearing loss and suffer from a rather low specificity. 2 In general applications, i.e. , NHS programs, these methods give results related to a general HT, and when a more detailed frequency specific determination of a HT is required, e.g.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Notched-Noise Embedded Frequency Specific Chirps for Objective Audiometry Using Auditory Brainstem Responses

Corona-Strauss

Schick²,

Delb

et al. 2012

Audiology Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It has been shown recently that chirp-evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) show better performance than click stimulations, especially at low intensity levels. In this paper we present the development, test, and evaluation of a series of notched-noise embedded frequency specific chirps. ABRs were collected in healthy young control subjects using the developed stimuli. Results of the analysis of the corresponding ABRs using a time-scale phase synchronization stability (PSS) measure are also reported. The resultant wave V amplitude and latency measures showed a similar behavior as for values reported in literature. The PSS of frequency specific chirp-evoked ABRs reflected the presence of the wave V for all stimulation intensities. The scales that resulted in higher PSS are in line with previous findings, where ABRs evoked by broadband chirps were analyzed, and which stated that low frequency channels are better for the recognition and analysis of chirp-evoked ABRs. We conclude that the development and test of the series of notched-noise embedded frequency specific chirps allowed the assessment of frequency specific ABRs, showing an identifiable wave V for different intensity levels. Future work may include the development of a faster automatic recognition scheme for these frequency specific ABRs.

show abstract