Das ?W�rzburger T?

Kuhnigk, Herbert; Steinhübel, Bernhard; Keil, Thorsten; Roewer, Norbert

doi:10.1007/s00101-004-0690-4

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Burney's work on the books of Kings (1903), and some works on Hosea throughout the main part of the twentieth century picked up the idea in explicit but largely tangential ways (Nyberg 1935;rudolph 1966). One of the earliest major formulations appeared in Kuhnigk's (1974) attempt to explain Hosea's language and concepts through extensive use of Ugaritic and other northwest semitic parallels. More recently, the works of seow (1992) and Yoo (1999) have argued that the presence of a dialect of 'Israelian Hebrew' is the definitive key to understanding the textual issues of Hosea.…”

Section: Traditional Approaches and Their New Formulationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hosea 4—14 in Twentieth-Century Scholarship

Kelle

2010

Currents in Biblical Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Twentieth-century scholarship on Hosea has addressed a wide range of interpretive questions that often reflect the common approaches to the prophetic literature in general, yet an inordinate amount of attention has been paid to the marriage and family imagery in Hosea 1—3. In recent years, scholars have corrected this tendency, exploring ways that texts throughout Hosea 4—14 offer insights into long-standing critical issues. Rather than exhibiting a movement in which newer methodological perspectives have replaced older traditional approaches, all of the established, modern scholarly pursuits remain prominent in the current study of Hosea 4—14. Scholars are now reformulating the traditional questions, however, from new angles largely generated by interdisciplinary influences. These influences have also given rise to previously unexplored lines of inquiry, such as synchronic, literary, and theological readings, Book of the Twelve studies, and metaphor theory. Studies using metaphor theory with an eye toward religious, political, socio-economic, and gender considerations seem likely to occupy the central place in Hosea scholarship in the immediate future.

show abstract

Section: Traditional Approaches and Their New Formulationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hosea 4—14 in Twentieth-Century Scholarship

Kelle

2010

Currents in Biblical Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Grund la ge der Bild gebung im Schock raum der Uni ver si täts klinik Würz burg war bis zum März 2004 die kon ven tio nel le Ra dio gra phie, die durch die in di ka ti ons be zo ge ne CT in an de ren Räum lich kei ten er gänzt wur de. Mit dem Um zug in das Zent rum Ope ra ti ve Me dizin und der da mit ver bun de nen Neu struktu rie rung des Schock rau mes war ein Neuent wurf auch des Po ly trau ma kon zep tes nö tig ge wor den [14]. Füh ren de bild ge bende Me tho de ist nun mehr die Ganz kör-per-CT. Dazu steht ein spe zi el ler 16-Zeilen-Scan ner (So ma tom Sen sa ti on 16®; Siemens AG Me di cal So lu ti ons, Forch heim) di rekt im Schock raum zur Ver fü gung.…”

unclassified