2020
DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v2i1.68
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang Dilakukan oleh Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PNS): Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor: 73/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN.Mdn

Abstract: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pertimbangan Hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan terhadap pegawai negeri sipil yang melakukan tindak pidana korupsi, serta untuk mengetahui penerapan kebijakan hukum terhadap pegawai negeri sipil yang melakukan tindak pidana korupsi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, yaitu suatu prosedur penelitian ilmiah untuk menemukan kebenaran berdasarkan logika keilmuan hukum, melalui sisi normatifnya. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
6

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The focus of the study in the case approach is the ratio decidendi or reasoning, namely the court's consideration of the decision. 12 The types and sources of data used in this study are as follows: (1)Primary data, namely data obtained by a researcher directly from the source without an intermediary (directly from the object), in this study in the form of the Decision of the Malili District Court No. 2/Pid.Sus-Anak/2018/PN Mll; (2) Secondary data, namely data obtained by researchers indirectly from the source (object of research), but through other sources, 13 in this study in library materials related to research problems and have coherence with primary data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus of the study in the case approach is the ratio decidendi or reasoning, namely the court's consideration of the decision. 12 The types and sources of data used in this study are as follows: (1)Primary data, namely data obtained by a researcher directly from the source without an intermediary (directly from the object), in this study in the form of the Decision of the Malili District Court No. 2/Pid.Sus-Anak/2018/PN Mll; (2) Secondary data, namely data obtained by researchers indirectly from the source (object of research), but through other sources, 13 in this study in library materials related to research problems and have coherence with primary data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the evidence law of the criminal act of corruption, the burden of evidence is not absolute on the public prosecutor. In this case, the evidence must be charged to the accused or the two parties who do the opposite in carrying out the evidence (Harefa et al, 2020). This kind of model is referred to as a reverse evidence system which also applies to the usual burden system for public prosecutors.…”
Section: "The Investigation Prosecution and Examination In Court Of C...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Putusan Hakim kemudian akan menjadi dasar dalam proses hukum selanjutnya. Oleh karena itu, putusan Hakim secara luas merupakan penentu atas keadilan, dan juga sebagai salah satu langkah untuk meminimalisir (Harefa, Manik, Marpaung, & Batubara, 2020) Dengan demikian, menjadi sangat penting ketika hakim memutus perkara tersebut untuk di eksaminasikan oleh para ahli hukum. Mingingat putusan-putusan pengadilan dapat menjadi sumber penting dalam pengembangan ilmu hukum di Indonesia.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified