2018
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DAT1-Genotype and Menstrual Cycle, but Not Hormonal Contraception, Modulate Reinforcement Learning: Preliminary Evidence

Abstract: Hormone by genotype interactions have been widely ignored by cognitive neuroscience. Yet, the dependence of cognitive performance on both baseline dopamine (DA) and current 17ß-estradiol (E2) level argues for their combined effect also in the context of reinforcement learning. Here, we assessed how the interaction between the natural rise of E2 in the late follicular phase (FP) and the 40 base-pair variable number tandem repeat polymorphism of the dopamine transporter (DAT1) affects reinforcement learning capa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of Reimers et al (2014) are consistent with the positive effect of estradiol in behavioral control discussed in Section 2.3.3. However, Jakob et al (2018) results indicate estradiol-related disturbances in the coding of the negative RPE signal during avoidance learning particularly in women whose striatal dopamine levels are already low. A similar effect was discussed with high estradiol dose in rodent models, making it likely that by facilitating the dopaminergic neurotransmission in the limbic areas increased estradiol interferes with a suppression of the tonic dopamine signal required for coding a negative RPE.…”
Section: Effects Of Ovarian Hormones On Outcome Valuation and Learninmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The findings of Reimers et al (2014) are consistent with the positive effect of estradiol in behavioral control discussed in Section 2.3.3. However, Jakob et al (2018) results indicate estradiol-related disturbances in the coding of the negative RPE signal during avoidance learning particularly in women whose striatal dopamine levels are already low. A similar effect was discussed with high estradiol dose in rodent models, making it likely that by facilitating the dopaminergic neurotransmission in the limbic areas increased estradiol interferes with a suppression of the tonic dopamine signal required for coding a negative RPE.…”
Section: Effects Of Ovarian Hormones On Outcome Valuation and Learninmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Better behavioral performance in the task during the follicular phase was associated with increased activation in the inferior frontal junction and rostral cingulate. As shown by preliminary results in Jakob et al (2018), learning of active avoidance was increasingly disturbed from early to late follicular phase in women who supposedly have lower dopaminergic neurotransmission in the striatum as indicated by the presence of 9-repeat allele in their DAT1-genotype, but their reward sensitivity remained unchanged.…”
Section: Effects Of Ovarian Hormones On Outcome Valuation and Learninmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In line with the dopamine-agonistic properties of estradiol, previous studies with humans showed that estradiol influenced model-free learning, also in interaction with the dopaminergic baseline capacity of the striatum that followed an inverted U-shape relationship (Diekhof, 2015;Jakob et al, 2018; see also Diekhof, 2018). In one study reward sensitivity was compromised when estradiol level reached its peak in the late follicular phase of the menstrual cycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Yet, it is still possible that the subjects from the two cycle phases differed in an aspect that was not matched here. For example, genetic variability in dopaminergic baseline capacity could represent a significant source of inter-subject variance (28), which was not controlled here. Since the results from the meta-analysis conformed to the present observation, and further replicated an already published within-subject finding, we think that it is very unlikely that an unknown inter-subject aspect determined the group-difference in avoidance learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%