2016
DOI: 10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data curation profiling of biocollections

Abstract: In the contexts of the data deluge and open data, scientists studying biodiversity benefit from online access to global datasets of existing vouchered biological and paleontological collections. Using biocollections collected over time across the world allows for the advancement of scientific knowledge concerning evolution in process as well as species poleward migrations, an indicator of climate change. This study's purpose was to validate and expand the Data Curation Profiles (DCP) to digital biocollections … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Efforts are underway with the Biodiversity Literacy in Undergraduate Education (BLUE; http://biodiversityliteracy.com) Network, which is developing curricula and building a community network to develop data literacy standards for future research career professionals and the public, who need to be able to interpret the results from global scientific research using botanical and natural history collections data. Reproducible science, appropriate citation, and open data should be priorities in training efforts of the biodiversity community (Bishop and Hank, 2016), with the FAIR Guiding Principles (i.e., Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability) for scientific data management and stewardship as a guiding infrastructure (Wilkinson et al, 2016).…”
Section: Education and Training Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Efforts are underway with the Biodiversity Literacy in Undergraduate Education (BLUE; http://biodiversityliteracy.com) Network, which is developing curricula and building a community network to develop data literacy standards for future research career professionals and the public, who need to be able to interpret the results from global scientific research using botanical and natural history collections data. Reproducible science, appropriate citation, and open data should be priorities in training efforts of the biodiversity community (Bishop and Hank, 2016), with the FAIR Guiding Principles (i.e., Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability) for scientific data management and stewardship as a guiding infrastructure (Wilkinson et al, 2016).…”
Section: Education and Training Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…collections need to be carried into future collecting efforts and expeditions. Data curation profiling of biocollections may assist managers and researchers to capture information that informs data curation beyond the technical needs for data ingestion (Bishop and Hank, 2016). Often, collection managers are one step removed from scientists and citizen scientists who have collected or are collecting the specimens.…”
Section: Born-digital Data and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several scholars have identified the exclusionary nature of the DC as problematic for memory institutions that serve broad publics (e.g. Bettivia, 2016;Bishop and Hank, 2016;Moles, 2019). From this perspective, repositories that explicitly seek to meet the needs of only some users or consumers necessarily privilege groups that they already understand while excluding groups with whom they are less familiar.…”
Section: Background/literature Review 21 Designated Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementing effective RDM practices in the early stages of a research project is a proactive approach to understanding data in their active use environment, increasing scholarly control of researchers and their engagement with their own research outputs (Bishop & Hank 2016). Therefore, from a researcher's perspective, RDM may help them reach their scholarly goals and achieve their desired research agenda.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%