2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1037/7/072004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-Driven Machine Learning for Wind Plant Flow Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bringing together physics-based models and data-driven techniques through data assimilation may improve the combined modeling accuracy for a variety of applications and may also reduce computational costs. An example of such an approach is the use of data to improve the fidelity of less-expensive physics-based models of plant flow for design and control applications (King et al 2018;Adcock et al 2018).…”
Section: Data-driven Modeling and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bringing together physics-based models and data-driven techniques through data assimilation may improve the combined modeling accuracy for a variety of applications and may also reduce computational costs. An example of such an approach is the use of data to improve the fidelity of less-expensive physics-based models of plant flow for design and control applications (King et al 2018;Adcock et al 2018).…”
Section: Data-driven Modeling and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of novelty, the authors know of only two examples of data-driven turbulence modeling applied to wind farms, namely those from Adcock et al [31] and King et al [32]. The papers employ quite a different approach to us, and do not go beyond a two-dimensional model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surrogate models provide streamlined approximations of more costly models and offer reduced computational time 38 . These data‐driven models can be used to augment or correct existing models, 39 as a complete stand‐alone model, 40 or as part of a multifidelity hierarchy of several models 41 . The computational cost of data‐driven models is generally front‐loaded into the model training process, while evaluating a trained model is comparatively inexpensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%