“…Modern data-driven methods aim to take a further step to overcome the limited expressive power of classical material models. In the (material) model-free paradigm proposed by Kirchdoerfer and Ortiz (2016) and first formulated for elasticity, a material's state of deformation is directly mapped to a stress state closest to the stress-strain pair available in the dataset (subject to physical compatibility constraints) (Kirchdoerfer and Ortiz, 2016;Ibañez et al, 2017;Kirchdoerfer and Ortiz, 2017;Conti et al, 2018;Nguyen and Keip, 2018;Eggersmann et al, 2019;Carrara et al, 2020;Karapiperis et al, 2021). Alternative approaches keep the concept of a material model and surrogate it by learning an approximate mapping between the strains and stresses (referring again to the easiest case of elasticity) using, e.g., sparse regression with feature engineering (Flaschel et al, 2021(Flaschel et al, , 2022Joshi et al, 2022;Wang et al, 2021), manifold learning methods and polynomial approximations (Ibañez et al, 2018(Ibañez et al, , 2017González et al, 2019b), Gaussian process regression (Rocha et al, 2021;Fuhg et al, 2022), and artificial neural networks (NNs) (Ghaboussi et al, 1991;Fernández et al, 2021;Klein et al, 2022;Vlassis and Sun, 2021;Kumar et al, 2020;Bastek et al, 2022;Zheng et al, 2021;Mozaffar et al, 2019;Bonatti and Mohr, 2021;Vlassis et al, 2020;Kumar and Kochmann, 2021;As'ad et al, 2022;Liang et al, 2022), with the list being roughly in order of decreasing physical interpretability and increasing approximation power.…”