2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-66185-8_85
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-Driven Rank Aggregation with Application to Grand Challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Limitations of this study included dataset bias (not all diseases, ages, devices, or ethnicities were represented equally across categories), and incomplete dermoscopic feature annotations. Reliance on single evaluation metrics rather than combinations may also be a limitation [27]. Future challenges will attempt to address these issues in conjunction with the community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitations of this study included dataset bias (not all diseases, ages, devices, or ethnicities were represented equally across categories), and incomplete dermoscopic feature annotations. Reliance on single evaluation metrics rather than combinations may also be a limitation [27]. Future challenges will attempt to address these issues in conjunction with the community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is important to point out that the top 5 teams outperformed other teams with a clear margin (average ≥6% in dice, recall and F-1 scores), while they themselves perform within marginal difference (Table 1). The specific ranking place may not be that important in this situation, as the commonly used average or accumulated ranking scheme may not reflect the importance of difference metrics for specific problems; hence, a different weighting scheme can dramatically change the ranking on real anatomical data [11].…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we present a customized U-Net FCN with residual connections, namely ResU-Net, to segment WHM by using combined T1 and FLAIR images. Given the high sensitivity of challenge rankings to metric weights [11], we put less emphasis on achieving the highest rank in the WMH Segmentation Challenge. Instead, our goal is to perform comparably to the Challenge leaders while demonstrating excellent generalization ability, thereby providing confidence that our solution can be effectively used outside the confines of the challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to a challenge's data, truth, and metrics defining its type, they also impact its "efficacy". Others have covered the difficulties associated with selecting data [12], truth [15], and metrics [13] to create "effective" challenges; however, much of that work has focused on maximizing a studys statistical significance. There are three difficulties with focusing on statistical significance when optimizing a challenge: 1) statistical significance is associated with testing a hypothesis and therefore is only relevant to quantitative experiments; 2) the complex interrelationship between data, metrics, and truth is oversimplified by commonly used measures of statistical significance; and 3) statistical significance is not a measure of practical significance or generalizability.…”
Section: Insight Designmentioning
confidence: 99%