2012 25th IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/cbms.2012.6266342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data fusion for multi-lesion Diabetic Retinopathy detection

Abstract: Screening of Diabetic Retinopathy (DR)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From all the images, 595 were classified as containing no sign of DR and 482 as showing pathological signs. In this case, we are only aware of a work addressing the task of DR detection on this dataset [45]. Since DR1 contains ground-truth regarding the presence of different lesions within each pathological image, DR detection is achieved by training separate detectors for each of them and then fusing the results with a meta-classifier.…”
Section: A Dr Detection Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From all the images, 595 were classified as containing no sign of DR and 482 as showing pathological signs. In this case, we are only aware of a work addressing the task of DR detection on this dataset [45]. Since DR1 contains ground-truth regarding the presence of different lesions within each pathological image, DR detection is achieved by training separate detectors for each of them and then fusing the results with a meta-classifier.…”
Section: A Dr Detection Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since DR1 contains ground-truth regarding the presence of different lesions within each pathological image, DR detection is achieved by training separate detectors for each of them and then fusing the results with a meta-classifier. Performance comparison with the results in [45] is shown in Table 3. In this case, the proposed technique clearly outperforms the method proposed in [45], which confirms the generality of our approach.…”
Section: A Dr Detection Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jelinek et al [31] employed data fusion for the detection of multiple lesions in the retinal images. The authors utilized visual word dictionary in combination of Speeded Up Robust Feature SURF descriptor for the feature extraction and multiple classifier were used for the classification of different lesions.…”
Section: Classification Of Microaneurysm and Hemorrhagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jelinek et al [31] employed SURF feature descriptor and visual word dictionary in feature extraction stage while three classifiers: logical OR fused classifier, Majority Vote fused classifier and Meta SVM were used in the classification stage. The method obtained 0.916 AUC for hard exudates and 0.896 for cotton woolen spot respectively.…”
Section: Classification Of Exudates and Cotton Woolen Spotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GMM (Gaussian Mixture Model) classifier is used and the accuracy of 97.3% is achieved. The data fusion method with a meta-SVM classifier for DR detection is implemented in [12]. An automatic method to detect MAs from retinal images using the C4.5 algorithm is implemented in [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%