2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-19821-2_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data Invariants to Understand Unsupervised Out-of-Distribution Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experiments revealed that the benefits of MahaAD observed for a variety of scenarios on 2D images [ 16 ] translate well to temporal iiOCT scans with high levels of noise and limited lateral view. Another benefit is its computational efficiency, allowing it to cope with high-frequency A-scan acquisition with minimal latency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The experiments revealed that the benefits of MahaAD observed for a variety of scenarios on 2D images [ 16 ] translate well to temporal iiOCT scans with high levels of noise and limited lateral view. Another benefit is its computational efficiency, allowing it to cope with high-frequency A-scan acquisition with minimal latency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, we leverage the MahaAD method proposed by Rippel et al [ 14 ] to learn the appearance of M-scans in the training dataset and detect when novel M-scans are too far from the training distribution to be safely processed by r . We select this model as it has been shown to be highly effective in a large number of cases while being interpretable and computationally lean [ 16 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To tackle these challenges, a transformative approach has emerged, wherein anomaly detection is reimagined as an out-of-distribution (OOD) problem [6][7][8]. Unsupervised anomaly detection models are trained using datasets devoid of anomalies, referred to as anomaly-free datasets [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%