Data Management Plan Requirements for Campus Grant Competitions: Opportunities for Research Data Services Assessment and Outreach

Johnson, Andrew; Knuth, Shelley L.

doi:10.7191/jeslib.2016.1089

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Within the research data management community the current focus is on making machine actionable, readable and interoperable DMPs exploiting the "thematic, machine-actionable richness with added value for all stakeholders" (Miksa et al, 2019). Several studies on DMPs take a quantitative approach to measuring effects, either in actual shared data or as successful funding (Diekema, Wesolek, and Walters, 2014;Johnson and Knuth, 2016;Mischo, Schlembach, and O'Donnell, 2014;Van Loon et al, 2017;Westra, 2017). Other articles focus on the importance of writing a DMP (Nature, 2018) or how to write one (Burnette, Williams, and Imker, 2016;Michener, 2015;Wright, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the United States, DMPs have been a standard requirement in grant application for a decade (Mischo et al, 2014), and analysis of DMP guidelines and DMPs is an established part of the literature on data management (Berman, 2017;Burnette et al, 2016;Diekema et al, 2014;Dressel, 2017;Hardy, Hughes, Hulen, and Schwartz, 2016;Johnson and Knuth, 2016;Thoegersen, 2016;Van Loon et al, 2017;Williams et al, 2017;Wright, 2016). In reading and analysing the literature two tendencies become evident.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Researchers' perspectives are found in case studies describing how the DMP was applied in a research group (Burnette et al, 2016;Dressel, 2017) or discipline (Dressel, 2017). Other studies use quantitative approaches to measure the effect of DMPs either by grant success rates (Mischo et al, 2014) or by evaluating the effectiveness of research support by assessing the quality of DMPs (Johnson and Knuth, 2016;Van Loon et al, 2017). These studies present a research support perspective.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Understanding the Data Management Plan as a Boundary Object through a Multi-stakeholder perspective

Kvale

Pharo

2021

IJDC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A three-phase Delphi study was used to investigate an emerging community for research data management in Norway and their understanding and application of data management plans (DMPs). The findings reveal visions of what the DMP should be as well as different practice approaches, yet the stakeholders present common goals. This paper discusses the different perspectives on the DMP by applying Star and Griesemer’s theory of boundary objects (Star & Griesemer, 1989). The debate on what the DMP is and the findings presented are relevant to all research communities currently implementing DMP procedures and requirements. The current discussions about DMPs tend to be distant from the active researchers and limited to the needs of funders and institutions rather than to the usefulness for researchers. By analysing the DMP as a boundary object, plastic and adaptable yet with a robust identity (Star & Griesemer, 1989), and by translating between worlds where collaboration on data sharing can take place we expand the perspectives and include all stakeholders. An understanding of the DMP as a boundary object can shift the focus from shaping a DMP which fulfils funders’ requirements to enabling collaboration on data management and sharing across domains using standardised forms.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Understanding the Data Management Plan as a Boundary Object through a Multi-stakeholder perspective

Kvale

Pharo

2021

IJDC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Data Management Practices and Perspectives of Atmospheric Scientists and Engineering Faculty.

Wiley¹,

Mischo²

2016

ISTL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article analyzes 21 in-depth interviews of engineering and atmospheric science faculty at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) to determine faculty data management practices and needs within the context of their research activities. A detailed literature review of previous large-scale and institutional surveys and interviews revealed that researchers have a broad awareness of data-sharing mandates of federal agencies and journal publishers and a growing acceptance, with some concerns, of the value of data-sharing. However, the disciplinary differences in data management needs are significant and represent a set of challenges for libraries in setting up consistent and successful services. In addition, faculty have not yet significantly changed their data management practices to conform with the mandates. The interviews focused on current research projects and funding sources, data types and format, the use of disciplinary and institutional repositories, data-sharing, their awareness of university library data management and preservation services, funding agency review panel experiences, and struggles or challenges with managing research data. In general, the interviews corroborated the trends identified in the literature. One clear observation from the interviews was that scientists and engineers take a holistic view of the research lifecycle and treat data as one of many elements in the scholarly communication workflow. Data generation, usage, storage, and sharing are an integrated aspect of a larger scholarly workflow, and are not necessarily treated as a separate entity. Acknowledging this will allow libraries to develop programs that better integrate data management support into scholarly communication instruction and training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

show abstract

Data Management Plan Requirements for Campus Grant Competitions: Opportunities for Research Data Services Assessment and Outreach

Cited by 2 publications

References 12 publications

Understanding the Data Management Plan as a Boundary Object through a Multi-stakeholder perspective

Understanding the Data Management Plan as a Boundary Object through a Multi-stakeholder perspective

Data Management Practices and Perspectives of Atmospheric Scientists and Engineering Faculty.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About