2022
DOI: 10.1080/21507740.2022.2148772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data, Metadata, Mental Data? Privacy and the Extended Mind

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…iv Several authors have explored the implications of the extended mind thesis for rights over, or duties with respect to, the mind. See, for example, Levy, 14 Anderson, 32 Buller, 18 Glannon, 19 Palermos 20 and Clowes et al 21 Our discussion differs from these earlier discussions in two regards. First, we are focusing specifically on one putative right of the mind: the right to mental integrity.…”
Section: The Right To Mental Integritymentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…iv Several authors have explored the implications of the extended mind thesis for rights over, or duties with respect to, the mind. See, for example, Levy, 14 Anderson, 32 Buller, 18 Glannon, 19 Palermos 20 and Clowes et al 21 Our discussion differs from these earlier discussions in two regards. First, we are focusing specifically on one putative right of the mind: the right to mental integrity.…”
Section: The Right To Mental Integritymentioning
confidence: 57%
“…43 Palermos contends that an extended mind perspective would have significant implications for the right to mental privacy, as it would imply that information stored in external devices, which is relatively easy to access, could include mental data. 20 He therefore argues for expansion of the right to mental privacy to include such data if the EMT holds true.…”
Section: Extended Essaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Development of various technological aids and prosthetics blurred the boundaries of originally biological persons, and a number of authors argue that in some cases we can talk about extended or hybrid persons -persons that are partly constituted by highly integrated artifactual aids to cognitive and perceptual processing of these extended systems (Clowes 2020;Hongladarom 2016;Milojevic 2020;Piredda & Candiotto 2019). These blurred boundaries already started to have an effect on legal practice when it comes to deciding if a certain damage to an artifact is just another property damage or a personal injury, like in the case of the damage of Neil Harbisson's "eyeborg" (see Milojevic 2017), but also in cases of privacy violations under the assumption that mental states can be stored on external devices (Palermos 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%