2012
DOI: 10.1504/ijstl.2012.047492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data mining in rail transport delay chain analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a very common practice of transport operators to provide live data on delays recorded on their own network, which can be recorded accessing public websites. Furthermore, the partition of operation into recurrent delay patterns allows inference on individual clusters, which is not possible with association or succession rules [25][26][27]. These methods do not provide causality connection and can only be used to compare scenarios, for example, before and after delay mitigation countermeasures have been implemented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is a very common practice of transport operators to provide live data on delays recorded on their own network, which can be recorded accessing public websites. Furthermore, the partition of operation into recurrent delay patterns allows inference on individual clusters, which is not possible with association or succession rules [25][26][27]. These methods do not provide causality connection and can only be used to compare scenarios, for example, before and after delay mitigation countermeasures have been implemented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, association rules can highlight common recurrences but cannot explain relations of causality between two events, so primary and secondary delays cannot be distinguished. Similarly, Wallander and Mäkitalo [26] identify delay chains according to the manual delay cause records from the dispatchers and based on timestamps at stations with granularity of 1 minute. The succession rules used are very similar to association rules but consider the time dependencies, so that events taking place earlier can be assumed to be the cause of events happening later under the same circumstances.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van der Meer et al mined data from peak hours, including rolling stock, and weather data and developed a predictive model involving the mining of track occupation data for delay estimations [9]. A data-mining approach was used for analyzing rail transport delay chains, with data from passenger train traffic on the Finnish rail network, but the data from the train running process was limited to one month [4]. Murali et al reported a delay regression-based estimation technique that models delay as a function of train mix and network topology [17].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, some skilled dispatchers usually predict HSTD empirically, which leads to differences in dispatching even for the same dispatcher when working in different situations. Data-driven approaches have recently gained more attention due to their better understanding of train delay concatenation and the fact they are more supportive of robust timetables and real-time dispatching [4]. In addition to the availability of train operation records, advanced data-mining techniques enable us to address these problems from a dataanalysis perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total train running time was predicted based on free running time predictors (horsepower per ton, track topography and slow orders) and congestion-related factors (meets, passes, overtakes, number of trains, total train hours, train spacing variability and train departure headway). Wallander and mäkitalo [22] used a data-mining approach for analysing rail transport delays with the aim of developing a more robust timetable structure and provide tools for rail network planning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%