2011
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awr212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data mining neocortical high-frequency oscillations in epilepsy and controls

Abstract: Transient high-frequency (100-500 Hz) oscillations of the local field potential have been studied extensively in human mesial temporal lobe. Previous studies report that both ripple (100-250 Hz) and fast ripple (250-500 Hz) oscillations are increased in the seizure-onset zone of patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Comparatively little is known, however, about their spatial distribution with respect to seizure-onset zone in neocortical epilepsy, or their prevalence in normal brain. We present a quantit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
137
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
137
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, scalp and intracranial EEG recordings contain physiological and epileptiform sharp transients and often artifacts (electrode noise, eye-, and muscle-related activity) that contain high frequency power, and digital filtering of these events could be incorrectly interpreted as HFOs [72,73]. Studies have implemented supervised and unsupervised computer-automated algorithms, some that incorporate aspects other than spectral power to improve specificity [63,[74][75][76][77] and one for specific types of HFOs [78]. While all detection strategies thus far have demonstrated strengths and weaknesses, a feasible and accurate approach will likely include a combination of computer-automated methods to process large data sets and manual inspection of a randomly selected sample of HFOs by experienced investigators.…”
Section: Recording Detection and Quantification Of Spontaneous Hfosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, scalp and intracranial EEG recordings contain physiological and epileptiform sharp transients and often artifacts (electrode noise, eye-, and muscle-related activity) that contain high frequency power, and digital filtering of these events could be incorrectly interpreted as HFOs [72,73]. Studies have implemented supervised and unsupervised computer-automated algorithms, some that incorporate aspects other than spectral power to improve specificity [63,[74][75][76][77] and one for specific types of HFOs [78]. While all detection strategies thus far have demonstrated strengths and weaknesses, a feasible and accurate approach will likely include a combination of computer-automated methods to process large data sets and manual inspection of a randomly selected sample of HFOs by experienced investigators.…”
Section: Recording Detection and Quantification Of Spontaneous Hfosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the size of high sampling rate data can be over 12 terabytes (TB) (Blanco et al, 2011). The size of high sampling rate data can cause a substantial amount of data, posing a challenge for data transfer, storage, archiving, sharing and analysis (Van Essen et al, 2012; Worrell et al, 2012; Zafeiriou and Vargiami, 2012; Zijlmans et al, 2012b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the classes were consistent with ripple and fast ripple oscillations, and a third consisted of mixed-frequency events. Blanco et al (2011) present an analysis of these classified groups of events with respect to seizure onset zone channels and other regions. The same dataset and methodology was used (Pearce et al, 2013) to investigate temporal changes of different types of HFO, their rate and proportions during interictal, preictal, ictal and postictal periods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%