2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.11.134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data on environmental sustainable corrosion inhibitor for stainless steel in aggressive environment

Abstract: This data article contains data related to the research article entitled “enhanced corrosion resistance of stainless steel Type 316 in sulphuric acid solution using eco-friendly waste product” (Sanni et al., 2018). In this data article, a comprehensive effect of waste product and optimized process parameter of the inhibitor in 0.5 M H2SO4 solution was presented using weight loss and potentiodynamic polarization techniques. The presence of the inhibitor (egg shell powder) influenced corrosion resistance of stai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tests were conducted three times, with approximately 99% reproducibility. The test sample preparation and experimental process for electrochemical, surface, and weight loss techniques were related to the one reported in the literature Equations and were employed to evaluate the corrosion rate (CR) and percentage inhibition efficiency at different inhibitor concentrations, respectively. CR = 87.6 W D × A × T 0.25em where T is the exposure time (hour), D is density (g/cm 2 ), A is area (cm 2 ), and W is weight loss (mg). IE ( % ) = CR false( uninhibited false) CR false( inhibited false) CR uninhibited × 100 where CR uninhibited and CR inhibited are the corrosion rate in the absence and presence of an inhibitor, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The tests were conducted three times, with approximately 99% reproducibility. The test sample preparation and experimental process for electrochemical, surface, and weight loss techniques were related to the one reported in the literature Equations and were employed to evaluate the corrosion rate (CR) and percentage inhibition efficiency at different inhibitor concentrations, respectively. CR = 87.6 W D × A × T 0.25em where T is the exposure time (hour), D is density (g/cm 2 ), A is area (cm 2 ), and W is weight loss (mg). IE ( % ) = CR false( uninhibited false) CR false( inhibited false) CR uninhibited × 100 where CR uninhibited and CR inhibited are the corrosion rate in the absence and presence of an inhibitor, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test sample preparation and experimental process for electrochemical, surface, and weight loss techniques were related to the one reported in the literature. 33 Equations 2 and 3 were employed to evaluate the corrosion rate (CR) and percentage inhibition efficiency at different inhibitor concentrations, respectively. where T is the exposure time (hour), D is density (g/cm 2 ), A is area (cm 2 ), and W is weight loss (mg).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This experiment was carried out three times at ambient temperature for each exposure time, and the average value of the loss in weight was documented. From this weight loss value, the surface coverage (θ), corrosion rate (mm/year), and inhibitor e ciency (%) were calculated using equations reported elsewhere [36,38].…”
Section: Weight Loss Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plot of corrosion rates and inhibition efficiency was plotted from the obtained data during the immersion time. The corrosion rate in mm/year and inhibition efficiency was calculated according to equations (1) and (2) [22]: CR 0 and CR are the FSS corrosion rates in inhibited and uninhibited acid solutions.…”
Section: Weight Loss Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%