2001
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20000214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Database of Geneva stellar evolution tracks and isochrones for (UBV)$_{\mathsf{J}}$(RI)$_{\mathsf{C}}$ JHKLL'M, HST-WFPC2, Geneva and Washington photometric systems

Abstract: Abstract.We have used an updated version of the empirically and semi-empirically calibrated BaSeL library of synthetic stellar spectra of Lejeune et al. (1997Lejeune et al. ( , 1998 and Westera et al. (1999) to calculate synthetic photometry in the (UBV)J(RI)C JHKLL M, HST-WFPC2, Geneva, and Washington systems for the entire set of non-rotating Geneva stellar evolution models covering masses from 0.4-0.8 to 120-150 M and metallicities Z = 0.0004 (1/50 Z ) to 0.1 (5 Z ). The results are provided in a database w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
771
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 519 publications
(798 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
24
771
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure B1 we plot Lejeune & Schaerer (2001) isochrones along with the positions of the 8 brightest O-stars in Pi 24. We take photometry and spectral types for these O-stars from Massey et al (2001a) except for Pi 24-1, which has since been resolved into two components, Pi 24-1 NE and Pi 24-1 SW (Maíz Apellániz et al 2007), with an optical/near ultraviolet ∆m ∼ 0.1.…”
Section: B01 Pismis 24 and Wr 93mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure B1 we plot Lejeune & Schaerer (2001) isochrones along with the positions of the 8 brightest O-stars in Pi 24. We take photometry and spectral types for these O-stars from Massey et al (2001a) except for Pi 24-1, which has since been resolved into two components, Pi 24-1 NE and Pi 24-1 SW (Maíz Apellániz et al 2007), with an optical/near ultraviolet ∆m ∼ 0.1.…”
Section: B01 Pismis 24 and Wr 93mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another di †erence, which is not clearly seen from the isochrones but has important consequences for the FIG. 16.ÈComparison of solar-metallicity isochrones from the Padua group (Girardi et al 2000) and Geneva group (Lejeune & Schaerer 2001). The Geneva isochrones produce cooler and fainter RSGs for a given age.…”
Section: Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In Figure 16 we compare solar-metallicity isochrones from the two groups for three di †erent ages (8,13,and 40 Myr), showing the Padua isochrones with solid lines and Geneva isochrones with dashed lines. As recommended by Lejeune & Schaerer (2001), we have used their "" extended ÏÏ grids, which incorporate high mass-loss rates for the most massive stars. One shortcoming of the Geneva models is that they do not list colors and magnitudes for Wolf-Rayet stars, because of the lack of accurate atmosphere models for these stars.…”
Section: Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison has been mainly performed with the Geneva models of Lejeune & Schaerer (2001), with solar metallicity. Other models have been considered (Claret 2004) without any major differences to the derived conclusions.…”
Section: Comparison With Stellar Evolutionary Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is probably the major source of systematic errors. In order to transform the derived temperatures and gravities to surface fluxes, the synthetic spectra are convolved with filter responses and are converted to absolute magnitudes and colors using a series of calibrations (see Lejeune & Schaerer 2001, for a description of the transformations applied). The accuracy of these transformations is usually defined within a few hundredths of magnitude (see Bessell et al 1998, for various determinations of the bolometric corrections for the Sun and the colors of Vega, and Flower 1996, for the dispersion on the bolometric correction for hot stars).…”
Section: The Distance To M 31mentioning
confidence: 99%