2010
DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2010.12011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Databasing Molecular Identities of Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) Clones Constructed with Microsatellite (SSR) DNA Markers

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
39
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During this process, which involves the preparation of arrows (inflorescence) for crossing, seed processing, progeny planting at the field, might lead to exchange of progenies, mixing, and pollen or seed contamination. According to Pan (2010), the probability of error in the identification is considerably higher in clones or cultivars used as parents, which are propagated during several times over the years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During this process, which involves the preparation of arrows (inflorescence) for crossing, seed processing, progeny planting at the field, might lead to exchange of progenies, mixing, and pollen or seed contamination. According to Pan (2010), the probability of error in the identification is considerably higher in clones or cultivars used as parents, which are propagated during several times over the years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all these applications, the most commonly used molecular markers are microsatellite markers (Pan, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SSR markers have also been important in sugarcane genetic mapping studies Edme et al, 2006;Suman et al, 2011). To improve the efficiency of sugarcane breeding, some of the transferable SSR markers have been successfully used for molecular genotyping of sugarcane germplasm (Pan et al, , 2007, identification of hybrid progeny from interspecific crosses (Pan et al, 2006), paternity analysis of polycross progeny (Tew and Pan, 2010), and construction of a sugarcane molecular identity database (Pan, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional sugarcane breeding is probably the most difficult job of any crop, due to the fact that sugarcane cultivars (Saccharum spp. hybrids) are highly polyploidy inter-specific hybrids containing 100 to 130 chromosomes [2,3]. The number of chromosomes may vary across geographical areas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other obstacles/constraints include small flower size, the development of the flower which may not synchronize between crossing parents, the likelihood of self-pollination, the difficulty in visually distinguishing F 1 hybrids from self progenies, the extreme genotypeˆenvironment or GˆE interactive effect, and potential variety mis-identification during vegetative propagation and varietal exchange, etc. [3,4]. It takes 12 to 14 years to develop a new sugarcane variety upon selection and evaluation against about 20 traits that include high tonnage, high sugar yield, early maturity, low fiber, harvest-ability, cold tolerance, ratooning ability, and resistance to a number of disease and insect pests [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%