2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-019-7844-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dataset characteristics influence the performance of different interpolation methods for soil salinity spatial mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This product integrates various gauge, satellite and reanalysis precipitation datasets and has been rigorously validated at different temporal scales and spatial scales with gauge precipitation observations, showing much improved accuracies compared to previous products. All the data mentioned above were processed into a resolution of 5 km using the inverse distance weighted (IDW) method (Sangani et al, 2019). We also obtained daily river discharge data from the Ministry of Water Resources for the Nuxia station and from our own observational measurements at the Dexing site (Figure 3d).…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This product integrates various gauge, satellite and reanalysis precipitation datasets and has been rigorously validated at different temporal scales and spatial scales with gauge precipitation observations, showing much improved accuracies compared to previous products. All the data mentioned above were processed into a resolution of 5 km using the inverse distance weighted (IDW) method (Sangani et al, 2019). We also obtained daily river discharge data from the Ministry of Water Resources for the Nuxia station and from our own observational measurements at the Dexing site (Figure 3d).…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure the consistency of different products, we interpolated all the products into the same 5 km spatial resolution grid using the inverse distance weighted (IDW) method (Ma et al, 2019;Qiao et al, 2019;Sangani et al, 2019) and calculated them at 3-hourly resolution. Due to its good performance on the TP, we then used the ITP-Forcing data to derive the multiyear mean 3 h data as background climatological precipitation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhou et al, 2015;Fang et al, 2019), especially in mountainous regions with high elevations and fewer ground measurements, such as the upper Brahmaputra (Xia et al, 2015;Xu et al, 2017;Qi et al, 2018). Additionally, there are several reanalysis datasets that have been widely used by researchers, such as the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS; Rodell et al, 2004;Zaitchik et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2011) and the Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA2) dataset (Savtchenko et al, 2015;Gelaro et al, 2017;Reichle et al, 2017a, b). Evaluation of GLDAS data has generally been limited to the United States and other regions with adequate ground observations (Kato et al, 2007;Qi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deterministic and geostatistical interpolation methods are commonly used for this purpose [5][6][7][8][9]. On the basis of similarity or smoothness within the study area, deterministic interpolation methods create surfaces using known points [10,11]. The deterministic interpolation methods can be divided into two types: global and local.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%