Variation in Datives 2012
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937363.003.0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Datives and Adpositions in Northeastern Basque

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Basque, dative Case is commonly considered to be assigned either by (High/Low) Appl or by a P head (see, among many others, Albizu 2001a, Rezac 2008a, 2008b, Albizu 2009, Etxepare & Oyharçabal 2009, Rezac 2009a, 2009b, Fernández 2010a, 2010b, Fernández & Ortiz de Urbina 2010, Rezac 2011, Fernández & Ortiz de Urbina 2012, Etxepare & Oyharçabal 2013, Odria 2014, Fernández 2015, Odria 2017, Ormazabal & Romero 2017, Odria 2019). However, in order to distinguish the dative object of impersonals from other inherent datives, we propose that the dative Case assigner in impersonals is instead K, a more general functional head that stands for (structural) Case—this is in fact the head that assigns dialectally attested differential object marking in transitive constructions (Odria 2017).…”
Section: Circumventing the Person Restriction: Differential Object Ma...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Basque, dative Case is commonly considered to be assigned either by (High/Low) Appl or by a P head (see, among many others, Albizu 2001a, Rezac 2008a, 2008b, Albizu 2009, Etxepare & Oyharçabal 2009, Rezac 2009a, 2009b, Fernández 2010a, 2010b, Fernández & Ortiz de Urbina 2010, Rezac 2011, Fernández & Ortiz de Urbina 2012, Etxepare & Oyharçabal 2013, Odria 2014, Fernández 2015, Odria 2017, Ormazabal & Romero 2017, Odria 2019). However, in order to distinguish the dative object of impersonals from other inherent datives, we propose that the dative Case assigner in impersonals is instead K, a more general functional head that stands for (structural) Case—this is in fact the head that assigns dialectally attested differential object marking in transitive constructions (Odria 2017).…”
Section: Circumventing the Person Restriction: Differential Object Ma...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are referring to instances with verbs such as fidatu 'rely on', interesatu 'interest', ohartu 'be aware of' and urrikitu 'to feel pity for'. We illustrate this type with the verb interesatu 'interest' in (73a-b), from the corpora and dictionaries: (NE Oyharçabal 2009-2013 Notice that the auxiliary accompanying the verb interesatu 'interest' does not show dative agreement with the dative stimulus in any of the sentences. This is a northeastern dialectal phenomenon that allows some instances of the dative agreement to be dropped (the interested reader should consult Etxepare and Oyharçabal (2013) and references therein for details).…”
Section: Typology Of Psych Nouns/adjectives: Extending Belletti and Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We illustrate this type with the verb interesatu 'interest' in (73a-b), from the corpora and dictionaries: (NE Oyharçabal 2009-2013 Notice that the auxiliary accompanying the verb interesatu 'interest' does not show dative agreement with the dative stimulus in any of the sentences. This is a northeastern dialectal phenomenon that allows some instances of the dative agreement to be dropped (the interested reader should consult Etxepare and Oyharçabal (2013) and references therein for details). The emergence of a dative instead of, or alternating with, an adposition has been interpreted as the result of French-Basque contact (see Pikabea (1993) for a detailed diachronic description).…”
Section: Typology Of Psych Nouns/adjectives: Extending Belletti and Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All the syntactic analyses in the literature agree that the indirect object DP (DP-io) is higher in surface representations than the direct object DP (DP-do). I assume that the DP-io moves to the specifier position of the Applicative Phrase, following the proposals in Rezac (2008), Oyharçabal (2010) and Etxepare & Oyharçabal (2012), among others 7 . I also follow the work mentioned above in assuming that the DP-do leaves its in situ position as a complement to the left of the verb to raise to Spec, v P for case assignment.…”
Section: An Analysis Based On Recursive Prosodic Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%