2017
DOI: 10.1017/pasa.2016.52
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dawes Review 6: The Impact of Companions on Stellar Evolution

Abstract: Astrophysicists are increasingly taking into account the effects of orbiting companions on stellar evolution. New discoveries have underlined the role of binary star interactions in a range of astrophysical events, including some that were previously interpreted as being due uniquely to single stellar evolution. We review classical binary phenomena, such as type Ia supernovae, and discuss new phenomena, such as intermediate luminosity transients, gravitational wave-producing double black holes, and the interac… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
141
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 420 publications
(630 reference statements)
1
141
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we already know from radial-velocity monitoring that many of the extra-massive thick-disc stars are plausibly multiple systems (Jofré et al 2016). In this work we test the possibility that these stars originate in multiple stellar systems and their properties arise from binary-star interactions (De Marco & Izzard 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we already know from radial-velocity monitoring that many of the extra-massive thick-disc stars are plausibly multiple systems (Jofré et al 2016). In this work we test the possibility that these stars originate in multiple stellar systems and their properties arise from binary-star interactions (De Marco & Izzard 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Lombardi et al 2002;Geller & Mathieu 2011). In binary stars, mass transfer either by direct Roche-lobe overflow or wind mass transfer is relatively common (De Marco & Izzard 2017). The increase in mass of a star causes it to look younger than it actually is (Sandage 1953;Tout et al 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interior structure and evolution (which will only be summarized briefly below) are discussed in the extensive review by Herwig (2005). Nucleosynthesis and stellar yields of single AGB stars are the topic of a recent review by Karakas and Lattanzio (2014), while binary evolution is discussed by De Marco and Izzard (2017). Willson (2000) gives a detailed analysis of problems in deriving a "mass-loss formula", i.e., a quantitative description of how the mass-loss rate depends on fundamental stellar parameters, as used in evolution models.…”
Section: Setting the Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer the reader to the recent review by De Marco and Izzard (2017) for a comprehensive overview and an in-depth discussion of the subject. Here, we can only give a flavour of aspects that are being discussed in the AGB literature.…”
Section: Mass Transfer and Binary Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, numerical studies of the CEE that consider only this orbital energy do not manage to eject the common envelope in a persistent and consistent manner (e.g., Taam & Ricker 2010;De Marco et al 2011;Passy et al 2012;Ricker & Taam 2012;Nandez et al 2014; ⋆ E-mail: soker@physics.technion.ac.il Ohlmann et al 2016;Staff et al 2016b;Kuruwita et al 2016;Iaconi et al 2017;De Marco & Izzard 2017;Galaviz et al 2017). These simulations might hint on the need for an extra energy source to eject the envelope.…”
Section: The Grazing Envelope Evolution (Gee)mentioning
confidence: 99%