2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41418-019-0361-2
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DC-SIGN–LEF1/TCF1–miR-185 feedback loop promotes colorectal cancer invasion and metastasis

Abstract: DC-SIGN is previously focused on its physiologic and pathophysiologic roles in immune cells. Little is known about whether DC-SIGN is expressed in malignant epithelial cells and how DC-SIGN participates in tumor progression. Here we showed that DC-SIGN expression was increased in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines and patient tissues. The overall survival in CRC patients with positive DC-SIGN was remarkably reduced. Gain of DC-SIGN function facilitated the CRC metastases both in vitro and in vivo, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The preferential binding of DC-SIGN to PaTu-S may be due to the higher abundance of fucose-containing Lewis antigens (64), whereas the higher MGL binding to PaTu-S can be explained by the higher levels of terminal GalNAc, including the Tn antigen. Binding of DCs to cancer cells via MGL and DC-SIGN was previously shown and has been proposed to lead to an immune escape of the tumor cells (65)(66)(67). Since MGL binds to terminal α-and β-linked GalNAc residues, including Tn-antigen (65,68), the differential binding of MGL and DC-SIGN to the cell lines corresponds well with their respective glycosylation profiles, especially in O-glycans.…”
Section: Patu-s and Patu-t Differentially Bind To Lectins Of The Immumentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The preferential binding of DC-SIGN to PaTu-S may be due to the higher abundance of fucose-containing Lewis antigens (64), whereas the higher MGL binding to PaTu-S can be explained by the higher levels of terminal GalNAc, including the Tn antigen. Binding of DCs to cancer cells via MGL and DC-SIGN was previously shown and has been proposed to lead to an immune escape of the tumor cells (65)(66)(67). Since MGL binds to terminal α-and β-linked GalNAc residues, including Tn-antigen (65,68), the differential binding of MGL and DC-SIGN to the cell lines corresponds well with their respective glycosylation profiles, especially in O-glycans.…”
Section: Patu-s and Patu-t Differentially Bind To Lectins Of The Immumentioning
confidence: 72%
“…miR-185 function is blocked by miR155HG, resulting in ANXA2 upregulation and glioblastoma growth and progression 30 . In CRC, miR-185 downregulation by TCF1/LEF1 contributed to DC-SIGN-induced cancer metastasis 31 . Interestingly, in nonsmall cell lung cancer, miR-185 inhibited cancer growth and invasion but increased chemosensitivity 32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LSD1 (lysine-specific demethylase 1) promotes bladder cancer progression by upregulating LEF1 and enhancing EMT [ 9 ]. LEF1 expression may contribute to cancer development [ 26 , 27 , 28 ], but there is a lack of evidence to support malignant phenotype changes, especially motility-associated microstructure changes, such as remodeling of lamellipodia/filopodia based on F-actin/β-tubulin polymerization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%