2013
DOI: 10.1107/s0021889812050029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DCD USANS and SESANS: a comparison of two neutron scattering techniques applicable for the study of large-scale structures

Abstract: This paper provides a comparison of the capabilities of two techniques for extending the range of conventional small‐angle neutron scattering (SANS) towards the micrometre length scale, namely the double‐crystal diffraction ultra‐small‐angle neutron scattering (DCD USANS) technique, which uses perfect silicon crystals in Bragg reflection, and spin‐echo SANS (SESANS), a method that uses the spin precessions of a polarized neutron beam. Both methods encode the scattering angle to very high precision. Based on ro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, some sedimentation cannot be excluded for this sample as well. However, the uncertainties in the current results compare favourably with reported corresponding values presented in a study comparing the accuracy of ultra-small-angle neutron scattering measured with doublecrystal diffractometers and SESANS (Rehm et al, 2013). Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Additionally, some sedimentation cannot be excluded for this sample as well. However, the uncertainties in the current results compare favourably with reported corresponding values presented in a study comparing the accuracy of ultra-small-angle neutron scattering measured with doublecrystal diffractometers and SESANS (Rehm et al, 2013). Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The SESANS technique is capable of examining much larger length scales (up to 10's of microns) than traditional SANS and is comparable in the upper range to the accessible length scales probed by ultra small angle neutron scattering (USANS). 19 The approach has a major advantage over the latter technique in that it can be applied to high concentration samples, as multiple neutron scattering effects may be taken into account exactly, 20 whereas USANS is a dilute solution measurement. The technique does not change the geometry of the sample, the scan ranges are determined by the applied magnetic fields and since the scattering is encoded in the beam polarisation rather than determined from angular deviations SESANS can also employ rather divergent beams, allowing efficient use of the available polarised neutron flux.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another measure that can be used as a guide to evaluate the probability of multiple scattering, is the so-called T SAS value. This corresponds to the fraction of the beam that passes through the sample without being scattered [38,39]. The T SAS value of a sample is experimentally determined as the ratio between the transmission of the direct beam (T Rock , as measured on the main detector) and the overall transmission of the direct beam and scattering pattern (T Wide , as measured on the transmission detector) and it can also be theoretically estimated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A T SAS value well above 0.9 indicates that the scattering signal is rather weak for USANS with a reduced probability of multiple scattering, while a decrease in a T SAS value below 0.9 indicates that there is an increased probability of multiple scattering. The T SAS value can be a very useful tool as a guide to the expected degree of multiple scattering [38][39][40]. Note however, that the effect of multiple scattering on scattering curves is q-dependent (see discussion below), and a higher degree of multiple scattering can be tolerated if the scattering curves do not show sharp features even in the single scattering regime.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%