2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2014.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DCube: A family of network structures for containerized data centers using dual-port servers

Abstract: a b s t r a c tA fundamental goal of datacenter networking is to efficiently interconnect a large number of servers in a cost-effective way. Inspired by the commodity servers in today's data centers that come with dual-port, we consider how to design low-cost, robust, and symmetrical network structures for containerized data centers with dual-port servers and low-end switches. In this paper, we propose a family of such network structure called a DCube, including H-DCube and M-DCube. The DCube consists of one o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Server centric architecture also has a switch but use the servers as a router. DCell [24], BCube [25], Ficonn [26], FlatNet [27], HCN & BCN [28], Dpillar [29], SWCube [30], FleCube [31,32], DCube [33], Fsquare [34] and sprintNet [35] are server-centric architecture. Using the switch in this kind of architecture may lead to bottleneck and increase cost and scalability of the network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Server centric architecture also has a switch but use the servers as a router. DCell [24], BCube [25], Ficonn [26], FlatNet [27], HCN & BCN [28], Dpillar [29], SWCube [30], FleCube [31,32], DCube [33], Fsquare [34] and sprintNet [35] are server-centric architecture. Using the switch in this kind of architecture may lead to bottleneck and increase cost and scalability of the network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because each switch has few microsecond delay to send and receive data. We can use the server instead of switch in DCN and increase network scalability [33].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The aggregate bottleneck throughput was established in [29] and is defined as the number of flows multiplied by the throughput of the bottleneck flow, where the bottleneck flow is the flow that receives the smallest throughput (by a flow we mean a path from a source to a sink complete with a data load; flows are generally used to refer to the transportation of significant amounts of data where the lifespan of the reserved path is non-trivial). The measurement of the aggregate bottleneck throughput (see, for example, [29,33,44]) is not usually undertaken with respect to a specific routing algorithm; rather, it is assumed that all flows traverse a shortest path between the two corresponding servernodes. Consequently, the calculation of the bottleneck flow is not always reflective of the variations in load caused by employing a specific routing algorithm.…”
Section: Support For Communication Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, server-centric data centres are now becoming commercially available. Typical examples of server-centric DCNs are DCell [7], BCube [8], FiConn [10], CamCube [2], MCube [15], DPillar [12], HCN and BCN [6] and SWKautz, SWCube and SWdBruijn [11]. An additional positive aspect of some server-centric DCNs is that not only can commodity switches be used to build the data centres but commodity servers can too: the DCNs FiConn, MCube, DPillar, HCN, BCN, SWKautz, SWCube and SWdBruijn are all such that any server only needs two NIC ports (the norm in commodity servers) in order to incorporate it into the DCN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%