GLOBECOM 2017 - 2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference 2017
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2017.8254107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

De-Anonymization of Networks with Communities: When Quantifications Meet Algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In sensor networks, where the knowledge of statistical dependencies among sensed data is given, the tasks of target tracking [20,21,22], detection [23], parameter estimation [24,2] are the examples, see [4] for a survey. In social networks, where the underlying social phenomenon of interest such as voting models, rumor/opinion propagation [7] evolves over a given social interaction graph, the inference tasks of distributed consensus-based estimation [6], deanonymization of community-structured social network [8] and distributed observability [5] are studied.Message-passing has manifested as an efficient procedure for inference over graphical models that provide the framework of succinct model of the statistical uncertainty of multi-agents. Examples include belief propagation (BP) [9], max-product [12,10] and references therein.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In sensor networks, where the knowledge of statistical dependencies among sensed data is given, the tasks of target tracking [20,21,22], detection [23], parameter estimation [24,2] are the examples, see [4] for a survey. In social networks, where the underlying social phenomenon of interest such as voting models, rumor/opinion propagation [7] evolves over a given social interaction graph, the inference tasks of distributed consensus-based estimation [6], deanonymization of community-structured social network [8] and distributed observability [5] are studied.Message-passing has manifested as an efficient procedure for inference over graphical models that provide the framework of succinct model of the statistical uncertainty of multi-agents. Examples include belief propagation (BP) [9], max-product [12,10] and references therein.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, out of many possible inference tasks, we consider the maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation, which is popularly applied in many applications such as data association for a multi-target tracking problem in sensor networks, community-structured social network de-anonymization problem in social networks [8].…”
Section: Cost-efficient Data Graph Learning Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the key results of [19] is that information with low transmissibility spreads more effectively within a small but densely connected social network. In [20], the authors present a comprehensive study of the community-structured social network deanonymization problem. The main focus of this work is on privacy and anonymization challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of these critical parameters are accounted for in the existing works such as [1], [7], [9], [10], [8], [11], [12], [13], and [17]. Moreover, even though the majority of existing literature such as [1], [7], [9], [10], [8], [12], [13], and [17] focuses on single community, some works such as [14], [15], [11], [19] and [20], do consider multiple communities. However, these multi-community works do not capture the dependence and effect of the centrality of one social community on the other, which is particularly important for cache placement in real-world D2D networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%