“…In all these studies, either the focus or the gender bias appears, since they are located in the second generation of analysis; that is to say, from the second-order digital divide or from the perspectives of inclusion and the threedimensional division of the digital divide [20,21] that integrate the gender component as a sociodemographic element or dependent variable. Other investigations have directly addressed the issue of the digital gender gap from the perspective of second-generation studies on the digital gap [6,8,9,21,33,34,36,52]. Lastly, it is worth mentioning that other studies can be placed within a poststructuralist and critical approach that invites reflection on the masculine within the sciences of the computing and cybernetics, as well as how to rethink and demystify the concept of the digital gender gap [9,33,51].…”