1995
DOI: 10.1109/18.382009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

De-noising by soft-thresholding

Abstract: is at least as smooth as f, i n a n y of a wide variety of smoothness measures.[Adapt]: The estimator comes nearly as close in mean square to f as any measurable estimator can come, uniformly over balls in each o f t w o broad scales of smoothness classes. These two properties are unprecedented in several ways. Our proof of these results develops new facts about abstract statistical inference and its connection with an optimal recovery model.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
4,156
1
87

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8,308 publications
(4,483 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
13
4,156
1
87
Order By: Relevance
“…Denoising is carried out in both dimensions using discrete wavelet transform with interval dependent thresholding 32 (cmddenoise function in Matlab). Set thresholds are based on Donoho thresholds, 33 and for denoising, the maximum number of intervals are set to 6 and 3 in the IM and RT dimensions, respectively, with levels set to 5 and 2 in the IM and RT dimensions, respectively. Daubechies 8 wavelet and hard thresholding is used in denoising for both dimensions.…”
Section: ■ Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Denoising is carried out in both dimensions using discrete wavelet transform with interval dependent thresholding 32 (cmddenoise function in Matlab). Set thresholds are based on Donoho thresholds, 33 and for denoising, the maximum number of intervals are set to 6 and 3 in the IM and RT dimensions, respectively, with levels set to 5 and 2 in the IM and RT dimensions, respectively. Daubechies 8 wavelet and hard thresholding is used in denoising for both dimensions.…”
Section: ■ Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, figure 14 shows a comparison between the proposed method and other image denoising algorithms: Donoho's digital wavelet (DWT) [17,18] and discrete cosine transform (DCT) based methods [19]. The proposed method has given the best results since it has been developed in order to reduce this specific noise pattern, achieving an improvement in Jaccard similarity coefficient of 0.2649 versus 0.1296 and 0.028 obtained by DWT and DCT methods respectively.…”
Section: Structuring Element Size Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of minimum mean-square error, wavelets generally outperform or at worst match conventional denoising or estimation techniques depending on the local smoothness properties of the underlying signal. Donoho (1995) noted that with ''overwhelming probability'', one can hope to recover a function that is at least as smooth as the true function, and that this observation holds across a wide range of smoothness classes. In the wavelet domain, this is equivalent to stating that noise has a high likelihood of disappearing from the recovered signal, which in turn leads us to have high confidence in the zeroed wavelet coefficients.…”
Section: P Value Interpretation Of Wavelet Thresholdingmentioning
confidence: 99%