2018
DOI: 10.1186/s13071-018-2874-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

De novo assembly and annotation of Hyalomma dromedarii tick (Acari: Ixodidae) sialotranscriptome with regard to gender differences in gene expression

Abstract: BackgroundHard ticks are hematophagous ectoparasites characterized by their long-term feeding. The saliva that they secrete during their blood meal is their crucial weapon against host-defense systems including hemostasis, inflammation and immunity. The anti-hemostatic, anti-inflammatory and immune-modulatory activities carried out by tick saliva molecules warrant their pharmacological investigation. The Hyalomma dromedarii Koch, 1844 tick is a common parasite of camels and probably the best adapted to deserts… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
3
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose of the RNA-seq analysis was to obtain gene sequences and identify differentially expressed genes of D. marginatus female adults after blood-feeding and long-term starvation regarding the significant role of female adult that plays in feeding large amount of blood and producing thousands of eggs per individual [ 35 ]. Another reason choosing females only for the RNA-seq analysis was to minimize the gene expression difference profiled by sexual distinction [ 36 , 37 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of the RNA-seq analysis was to obtain gene sequences and identify differentially expressed genes of D. marginatus female adults after blood-feeding and long-term starvation regarding the significant role of female adult that plays in feeding large amount of blood and producing thousands of eggs per individual [ 35 ]. Another reason choosing females only for the RNA-seq analysis was to minimize the gene expression difference profiled by sexual distinction [ 36 , 37 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the combined timepoint profiles of expression of transcripts encoding these proteins in males and females of R. zambeziensis, they were also similar to those seen in R. microplus adults with the exception again of metalloproteases, but also of evasins, 8.9 kDa protein family and mucins, where females presented greater representation of these transcripts than males. We have already pointed out above the possible explanation for the discrepancy between levels of expression of IGBP in the sialotranscriptome generated in the present study and in that of males of the two-or three-host tick H. dromedarii that can infest cattle as well as camelids 40,41 . At present it is not possible to ascribe a role for secreted salivary protein families in determining the number of hosts different species of ticks have in their life cycles.…”
Section: Comparisons Between the Sialotranscriptomes Of Males And Femmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…IGBPs have been found in all male hard ticks examined to date, including in Ixodes scapularis, which frequently mates off its hosts. The exception is Hyalomma dromedarii 40 , where transcripts for IGBPs were not found in the salivary gland transcriptomes from males and females feeding on camels and a partial sequence was obtained for a single type of IGBP in the corresponding proteome. Camelids of the Saharan regions are the natural hosts of H. dromedarii 41 , mammals which produce mainly single chain antibodies, instead of conventional antibodies.…”
Section: Representation Of Specific Protein Families In the Context Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of the RNA-seq analysis was to identify differentially expressed genes of D. marginatus female adults after blood feeding and long term starvation regarding the signi cant role of female adult that plays in feeding large amount of blood and producing thousands of eggs per individual [29]. Another reason choosing females only for the RNA-seq analysis was to minimize the gene expression difference pro led by sexual distinction [30,31].…”
Section: Tick Rearingmentioning
confidence: 99%