The Palgrave Handbook of Criminal and Terrorism Financing Law 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-64498-1_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

De-risking: An Unintended Negative Consequence of AML/CFT Regulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, they remain unacknowledged because banks’ size and geographic location affect perceptions about the banks in the international market (Duncan, 2018). In addition, AML regulation has caused private actors involved in de-risking (and de-banking) clients (Ramachandran, Collin, and Juden, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, they remain unacknowledged because banks’ size and geographic location affect perceptions about the banks in the international market (Duncan, 2018). In addition, AML regulation has caused private actors involved in de-risking (and de-banking) clients (Ramachandran, Collin, and Juden, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 In the same sense, concerns have been expressed as to the fact that AML regulation has resulted in private actors engaging in de-risking (and de-banking) of customers. 35 Given this context, an extensive literature exists on AML, mainly focusing on the financial sector. 36 Moreover, as already recalled, international and national legislations have increasingly imposed obligations on different sectors and the actors involved in them, including lawyers, accountants and estate agents.…”
Section: Contextualising Aml In the Real Estate Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the fear governing the relationship between the regulatory authorities and the banking sector, and banks not feeling that they are partners in tracking criminals through the financial system, they will continue to operate conservatively and to restrict services for high-risk customers (Keatinge, 2014b). The remittance companies are regarded as high-risk customers even though they comply with the procedure because the money remitters to the high-risk countries (Ramachandran et al, 2018). In this regard, the Dahabshill is an interesting case.…”
Section: Money or Value Transfer Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%