De-Westernization and Decolonization in Media Studies

Abstract

The need to de-Westernize and decolonize communication and media studies is based on criticisms on a dominant elitist “Western” axiology and epistemology of universal validity, leaving aside indigenous and localized philosophical traditions originating in non-Western settings. Scholars of the Global South continue to question a dominant inherent Eurocentric bias that was—and continuous to be—underlying many Anglo-American and European research projects. Scholars warn against a persistent influence of foreign-imposed concepts such as modernity and development, as well as universal assumptions regarding the use of certain categories and ontologies to deconstruct and understand the media around the globe. While the West is understood more as a center of power than as a fixed geographical entity, de-Westernization asks for a revision of the power relations in global academic knowledge production and dissemination. The most prominent call for de-Westernizing media studies goes back to Curran and Park who, in the early 2000s, encouraged a Western academic community to revise and re-evaluate their theories, epistemologies, methods, and empirical research approaches, especially in research targeting the Global South. In a similar way, the call for decolonization asks to investigate and question continuing colonial power imbalances, power dependencies, and colonial legacies. It challenges the uncritical adoption of research epistemologies and methods of former colonial powers in solving local problems, as they fail to explain the complexities of non-Western societies and communities, asking for practicing “decolonial epistemic disobedience.” Contrary to de-Westernization aimed at a Western research community, scholars from the Global South have struggled for decades for international recognition of their voices and intellectual contributions to a global academic community. Their ideas draw on post-colonialism, subaltern studies, or a critical-reflective sociology. Different efforts have been made to address the global imbalance in media studies knowledge generation. However, neither replacing theories with indigenous concepts alone nor being relegated to cases studies that deliver raw data will gain ground in favor of countries of the Global South, as research efforts need to incorporate both local realities and wider contextualization, or the call for a research with a region, not just about or from it. More successful are cooperative South-South efforts, as the thriving scholar networks in Latin America, Africa, or Asia demonstrate. The de-Westernization and decolonization project is ongoing. Where inequalities appear most pressing are in resource access and allocation, in conference participation, or in publishing opportunities. In this sense, journalism and media studies curricula still reflect largely an Anglophone centrism and a lack of understanding of local issues and expectations. Here, more reflective de-Westernizing approaches can help to lessen the gaps. However, as de-Westernization relies on vague geographical categorizations, the term cannot be the final path to re-balance the academic knowledge exchange between powerful and less powerful actors.

İletişim Çalışmalarına Postkolonyal Müdahale

“…Oysa dil yalnızca iletişim aracı değildir. Her dil onu öğrenenlere "yeni zihinsel yapılar" (Phillipson, Linguistic Imperialism, 1992, s. 166) Batılı ve Batılı olmayan akademisyenlerin araştırma imkânları arasındaki eşitsizlikler, kendini en fazla kaynaklara erişim, kaynak dağılımı, konferanslara katılım ve yayın yapma fırsatlarında göstermektedir (Glück, 2018). Afonso de Albuquerque ve arkadaşları (2020), iletişim çalışmaları alanındaki uluslararası araştırmalarda yaşanan eşitsizliklerin süreklilik taşıdığına işaret etmiş ve bunun epistemolojik değil, politik ve sosyolojik bir sorun olduğunu söylemiştir.…”

Iqiyi E a Televisão Chinesa: Uma Reflexão Sobre as Plataformas De Streaming Sob Demanda Para Além Do Ocidente

“…É justamente no intuito de ampliar os olhares no campo dos estudos sobre televisão e sobre plataformas de vídeo sob demanda que o presente artigo foi formulado. Trata-se de uma iniciativa que dialoga com a necessidade de desocidentalização nos estudos sobre mídia e comunicação (GLUCK, 2018;CURRAN & PARK, 2000). Aqui, nos interessa a reflexão sobre um dos exemplos de SVOD para além desse Ocidente: o caso da iQIYI, por ser um dos três grandes serviços de streaming licenciados da República Popular da China.…”

Can African scholars speak? Situating African voices in International Communication scholarship

“…Despite the feeble attempts, other scholars continue to question the notion of agency in the growing scholarship in Africa (Alden & Large, 2019; Thussu et al, 2018), arguing that the voices of the global south are yet to be realized at an international level. Other scholars have even gone to the extent of questioning the amount of scholarship emanating from African themselves as opposed to Western scholars claiming expertise of the African continent (Glück, 2018; Mohammed, 2021). If indeed authored by Africans, those who are Western-trained usually replicate the systemic line of thought advanced by Western epistemologies (Kalyango et al, 2017).…”