2019 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ecce.2019.8913003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deadbeat Control for Circulating Harmonic Currents Suppression of a Level-Increased NLM Based Modular Multilevel Converter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The single-phase MMC in the simulation contains seven SMs per arm (N = 7), along with the parameter configuration given in Table 1. For a full assessment, comparisons between the proposed control scheme as well as the conventional NLC and PNLC methods, the level-increased NLC with circulating harmonic current suppression based on deadbeat control approach in [39], and the reduced computational burden MPC approach in [45] were obtained via simulations. The sampling frequency exerts a significant impact on the control performance of predictive control.…”
Section: A Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The single-phase MMC in the simulation contains seven SMs per arm (N = 7), along with the parameter configuration given in Table 1. For a full assessment, comparisons between the proposed control scheme as well as the conventional NLC and PNLC methods, the level-increased NLC with circulating harmonic current suppression based on deadbeat control approach in [39], and the reduced computational burden MPC approach in [45] were obtained via simulations. The sampling frequency exerts a significant impact on the control performance of predictive control.…”
Section: A Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figs. 7(a)-(e) illustrate the simulated results of the output current and voltage under steady-state operation using the conventional NLC, conventional PNLC, the level-increased NLC with circulating harmonic current suppression based on deadbeat control [39], the reduced computational burden MPC [45], and proposed I-PNLC methods, respectively. With reference to Fig.…”
Section: A Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several methods have been proposed in the literature for CCC in MMCs for a variety of purposes [10][11][12][13][14][15]. However, none of these methods were focused on utilization for lifetime improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might result in deterioration of the output voltage quality. Recently, an NLC method with circulating harmonic current suppression with deadbeat control was proposed in [21], where the numbers of inserted SMs in the upper and lower arms from the levelincreased NLC II were adjusted based on the deadbeat controller to regulate the circulating current. This control scheme inherited the merits of both the level-increased NLC II and deadbeat controller to improve the output quality and control the circulating current.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%