2018
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2017.0317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dealing with indistinguishable particles and their entanglement

Abstract: Here, we discuss a particle-based approach to deal with systems of many identical quantum objects (particles) that never employs labels to mark them. We show that it avoids both methodological problems and drawbacks in the study of quantum correlations associated with the standard quantum mechanical treatment of identical particles. The core of this approach is represented by the multiparticle probability amplitude, whose structure in terms of single-particle amplitudes we derive here by first principles. To c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
87
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us consider three identical qubits, each in the state |ϕ k σ k ≡ |ϕ k ⊗ |σ k (k = 1, 2, 3), where ϕ k is the k-th spatial wavefunction and σ k is the corresponding pseudospin ↑, ↓ (e.g., components of a spin-1/2 fermion, two energy levels of a boson, horizontal H and vertical V polarizations of a photon). Using the NSA [9], the three-qubit elementary state is |Φ (3) = |ϕ 1 σ 1 , ϕ 2 σ 2 , ϕ 3 σ 3 , which cannot be separated in terms of tensor products of single-qubit states: it must be meant as an overall object representing a list of the single-particle states.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let us consider three identical qubits, each in the state |ϕ k σ k ≡ |ϕ k ⊗ |σ k (k = 1, 2, 3), where ϕ k is the k-th spatial wavefunction and σ k is the corresponding pseudospin ↑, ↓ (e.g., components of a spin-1/2 fermion, two energy levels of a boson, horizontal H and vertical V polarizations of a photon). Using the NSA [9], the three-qubit elementary state is |Φ (3) = |ϕ 1 σ 1 , ϕ 2 σ 2 , ϕ 3 σ 3 , which cannot be separated in terms of tensor products of single-qubit states: it must be meant as an overall object representing a list of the single-particle states.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(a). Considering all the possible bipartitions (AB)-C, (CA)-B, (BC)-A of the three-particle system, by performing localized projective measurements and partial traces [9] one finds that all the three bipartitions give pure one-particle and two-particle reduced density matrices. Following conventional wisdom this state is, as expected, fully uncorrelated [11].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can recast the above idea in the language of second quantization. If |Φ is an N -particle state, its inner product with a single-particle state |ψ k is [15] a ψ k |Φ ≡ ψ k | · |Φ Note that since a ψ k is an annihilation operator, the left hand side of the above equation represents an (N − 1)-particle state which, by definition, is the inner product on the right hand side. As mentioned earlier, this simple expedient allows us to go beyond bosons and fermions by suitably generalising the operator algebra.…”
Section: Second Quantization Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this Letter, we generalize the resource theory of coherence to systems of identical particles, using a particle-based approach that only allows physical labels to address the particles in the system [19,20]. Our aim is to show how indistinguishability may be a source of operational coherence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coherence of identical particle states. -Let us consider, in the no-label formalism [19][20][21], two identical spins (that is particles with a two-level internal state space) in the mixed state…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%