2002
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dealing with soil variability: some insights from land degradation research in central Spain

Abstract: Soil variability is often seen as problematic in land degradation studies in terms of sampling effort, data interpretation and for the extrapolation of results to other areas or time periods. Examples are given from land degradation research undertaken in central Spain which demonstrate some of these problems associated with soil variability. Geostatistics is presented as a usefu1 tool for quantifying soil variability and in particular the variogram for interpreting and understanding spatial patterns. Soil var… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also Cammeraat and Imeson (1999), Lesschen et al (2008) and Navarro et al (2006) refer to the specific patchiness and distinctive micro-topography. Fitzjohn et al (2002) outline the difficulties of this smallscale heterogeneity for monitoring, understanding, interpreting and managing, but they derive an 'effective strategy for reducing runoff and erosion risk' from the spatial variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also Cammeraat and Imeson (1999), Lesschen et al (2008) and Navarro et al (2006) refer to the specific patchiness and distinctive micro-topography. Fitzjohn et al (2002) outline the difficulties of this smallscale heterogeneity for monitoring, understanding, interpreting and managing, but they derive an 'effective strategy for reducing runoff and erosion risk' from the spatial variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process dynamics and the development are difficult to record and evaluate (García-Ruiz et al, 1991;Fitzjohn et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil distribution and variability has also been identified as relevant for understanding degradation and regradation processes (Fitzjohn et al, 2002;Seeger et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This nested model implies that the short-range variations of leaching are due to the presence of local pedotopographic characteristics such as soil properties and land-cover, according to Cambardella et al (1994), Rahman et al (1996), andFitzjohn et al (2002). This finding suggest that the increase of variability in pedotopographic properties produces a mosaic pattern of source and sink area.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%