2014
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dealing with Uncertainty in Water Distribution System Models: A Framework for Real-Time Modeling and Data Assimilation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
0
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Except for the groundwater remediation design examples already noted, the approach has also been used extensively in water distribution system optimisation applications (e.g. Behzadian et al, 2009;Broad et al, 2005;Broad et al, 2010) and in real-time control (Hutton et al, 2014).…”
Section: Current Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except for the groundwater remediation design examples already noted, the approach has also been used extensively in water distribution system optimisation applications (e.g. Behzadian et al, 2009;Broad et al, 2005;Broad et al, 2010) and in real-time control (Hutton et al, 2014).…”
Section: Current Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In hydraulic modeling as well as in measuring hydraulic parameters one has to face several sources of uncertainty (Hutton et al 2014). We therefore assume that these effects should be taken into account in OSP algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leakage can be a burst or any event that induce similar abnormal pressure/flow variations at the district metered area (DMA) level. Goulet et al (2013) assessed that the most important uncertainty sources are demands and model simplifications, but uncertainty also originates from measurement errors, incorrect boundary conditions, inherent model structural errors or unknown status of valves [(Hutton et al 2014), (Walski et al 2014)]. The calibration in this work focuses on demands due to their daily variability and continuous evolution depending generally on social and climate factors comparing to the more stable evolution of roughness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%