Death in Berlin: Hegel on mortality and the social order

Heisenberg, Thimo

doi:10.1080/09608788.2020.1838437

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…111-130);Darwall (1977, 36ff); andKatz (2020a, pp. 95-97).16 Heisenberg (2021) has recently offered an insightful account of the ways in which Hegel's Sittlichkeit is geared to help individuals reconcile themselves with their finitude-with an emphasis on the role of civil society. While I ultimately stress the insufficiency of civil society as an existential device, I have learned a lot from Heisenberg's paper and from generous and engaging discussions with him.17 In English translations, verachten and its cognates are rendered variably to "contempt", "despise" or "loathe".…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Finite freedom: Hegel on the existential function of the state

Katz

2021

European J of Philosophy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article argues that Hegel's glorification of self‐sacrifice in war is grounded in a commitment to individual freedom. Anticipating the existentialists, Hegel believes that being a human individual—a subject who strives to self‐determination and “infinite uniqueness”—involves a contradiction with one's externally determined finitude, which evokes shame and fear of death. In modern civil society, many individuals experience their finite lives as secure and adequately expressive of their self‐determined uniqueness and are thereby relatively shielded from fear of death. For Hegel, I argue, this experience loses touch with a basic existential condition and coincides with a rigid and “spiritually dead” mindset he calls “self‐will.” Patriotism—including the willingness to self‐sacrifice—constitutes Hegel's remedy to this problematic. The state summons its citizens to face their finitude and thereby injects their lives with renewed vitality and sensitivity.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%